Did you actually read the article that you posted? Because it clearly says all of the things in it that your headline says that it does not say.
I just looked at the article on the original site. Apparently I "actually" read the article before posting. I do not see anything about why he was pulled over. So, I'm not sure how to make sense of your reply. I'm wondering what it is that YOU read.
I was referring specifically to your title. Which states that there was no reference to him being the aggressor and the use of let's lethal Force and stuff. Which they mentioned multiple times.
Well, to bury something means to put it under something. They have the rage title to drum up chaos. They have a few paragraphs that don't explain what happened. Then, they share a little bit about a raging nigger who couldn't be controlled any other way than shooting him.
BURY.....it's the fourth word in the title.
bury != does not say.
yeah?
"bury the lede phrase of lede US fail to emphasize the most important part of a story or account. "one should always listen carefully to the president, as he has a tendency to bury the lede""
Exactly. Saying that the info was buried does not equal saying it was not said. That guy was strawmanning you with saying that you said something in the title that you did not say, and then attacking you for saying that something that you did not say.
A meth addict may be able to bury those sores under makeup and IG filters, but if you look hard enough, you'll see them.
EDIT: Not deleting my post. There's no info on the link to the article about why the nigger was pulled over.
I'll have to check it out because I read it off of the NewsBreak App then found the publishing website's link to share it. It's possible that what I saw was abbreviated and there's much more on the original site. Lesson learned. Sorry if I mislead anyone. I'll delete in a few.
EDIT: Not deleting my post. There's no info on the link to the article about why the nigger was pulled over.
I don't know about that, you did not mention that in the title. I was specifically referencing the part about him being the aggressor and the use of less lethal Force which you pointed out in your title as being not in the article when in fact it was.
lol. find someone to agree with you. I just can't. Again, BURY is mentioned.
(post is archived)