WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

But of course.

But of course.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

But the post definitely came across as though r/news was just trying to suppress the story altogether,

Does it?

[–] 0 pt

Doesn’t it?

Edit: maybe my wording was bad. I was saying this post came across as trying to say that r/news was blah blah

[–] 1 pt

trying to say that r/news was blah blah

Where does it?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Of course it doesn’t say it outright. You don’t feel like the purpose of this post was to confuse people into thinking that r/news was suppressing that smollett was found guilty? Because that was certainly the impression I got until I looked for myself.

It never mentions that it was a post that violated the sub rules or that another thread exists at the top of the sub, it just shows that r/news is deleting jussie smollett threads.

I do believe the intention of this post was to be misleading