WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Maybe the normies will finally start to catch on.

https://pic8.co/sh/9Q7lts.jpg

Personally, I feel the Sepharad elite run the Wahabbists and always have... after they infiltrated the hashishans and held Saladin hostage in his own camp outside of Jerusalem in the 1100s.

Either way, Trump's Twitter ban may be directly related to his ability to drop the price of oil. Maybe they didn't care for being blackmailed over Khashoggi's murder.

[–] 4 pts

Sauds are jews.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Sepharad elite = Sephardic Jews like the Sassoon family and other recipients of large amounts of gold in Iraq that was smuggled out by melting it with brass scrap during Desert Storm and, more recently, from ISIS hold outs in Syria... aka agents of the Sephardics who got stabbed in the back. They were never going to let them keep the gold.

[–] 1 pt

DERP - sorry, you're absolutely right.

Since Elon owns 9 or so % of twatter wouldn't he have admin rights?

Couldn't he just unban Trump whenever he wanted?

ELI5

[–] 0 pt

Kind of a Grey area.

Keep in mind, the hidden monopoly is actually the majority shareholder.

For most people, I tell them it is Blackrock and that is a decent shortcut to think about it.

However, the hidden monopoly is really made up of several similar conglomerates, like Vanguard and they own 30% of Twitter. Throw in their friends, like the Saudi Prince, who owns 5.1% and you see how Elon has created a war.

Vanguard stepped in today to buy more than Elon, and I bet they are doing the same in other companies... for a loss... to stop this kind of takeover.

Twitter offered to put Elon on the Board. He declined because it limits his maximum percentage to 14.1% and his counter was to buy the company, officially lodging the offer with the SEC.

THAT is when the Saudi Prince popped his head up.

Elon asked about how much they actually own and highlighted a legal problem, causing Vanguard to buy shares they knew would lose money right away.

Keep in mind, Twitter is just a gateway for a half billion in astroturfing efforts. For 40 billion, Elon can monitor, silence or massage much more money worth of media manipulation while also gaining the political advantage of having doxx on every bad state actor. This is more than just money we're talking about. It's about who gets to pick the next president.

Either way, to answer your question... Twitter doesn't have to... legally... show Elon much of anything, though generally a great deal of cooperation is normal.

If he ended up on the board, he would likely have admin and staff with admin access.

If he owns it, outright, he can do a lot of interesting things.

But... keep in mind... Blackrock and friends own lots of Tesla, as well.

This might all be kabuki theater.

[–] 1 pt

Vanguard stepped in today to buy more than Elon, and I bet they are doing the same in other companies... for a loss... to stop this kind of takeover.

Aren't they buying in below what Musk offered for it? How is that a loss? My understanding was I could do the same thing if I wanted to. It's a publicly traded company.