Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

722

Personally I have no idea if anyone banned was manipulating voat the way Putt said they were. I did find a peculiar statement by Putt that hinted goats could get banned for having a multi-day argument. When I asked for clarification I got nothing. Makes me think whoever the angel investor is didn't like that level of discord on his newly purchased site.

New investor comes in a few months back. Soon afterwards a big ban on a bunch of goats. A few months later a big ban on a bunch of goats. Again I have no idea if you all deserved it or not but it does seem a tad suspicious.

Personally I have no idea if anyone banned was manipulating voat the way Putt said they were. I did find a peculiar statement by Putt that hinted goats could get banned for having a multi-day argument. When I asked for clarification I got nothing. Makes me think whoever the angel investor is didn't like that level of discord on his newly purchased site. New investor comes in a few months back. Soon afterwards a big ban on a bunch of goats. A few months later a big ban on a bunch of goats. Again I have no idea if you all deserved it or not but it does seem a tad suspicious.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 0 pt

Some kind of privileged access to their videos linking from Voat. Right around the time the investor thing came down someone running the Bitchute bot or whatever was notifying people that they were adding a special Voat button to the videos at the Bitchute site.

But again, it's all vague and my impression of what I saw may even not be investor related. But it seemed like it was.

[–] • 0 pt

That's certainly possible and that's a good observation. It's still the jews but we'll agree to disagree.