It appears that, on voat, this user there posted things that were in accordance with voat's TOS but that you did not like. And then you harassed the user until the user left voat (or the user simply ran out of things to post or left voat due to nothing related to you).
Is this accurate ?
they were not in accordance with voat TOS.
lolit was the content they posted to cover themselves. loli fails the dost test thus it break rules regarding CP. the users fucking pedo shenanigans were so bad they tipped the ruletable over on that issue, no joke.
last i checked, not even poal allows loli
Obviously, they WERE, as you noted that postings were posted and no indication that they were deleted by mods of voat.
You seem retarded.
Poal rules? Not even the owner knows all the rules. Is loli allowed? I dunno, don't really care; I would not visit a sub like that but others might like to. I don't think cartoons are CP...but the owners can make up rules more narrow.
Obviously, they WERE, as you noted that postings were posted and no indication that they were deleted by mods of voat.
voat is the wild west rules-wise, by declaration of putt
putt, instead of being an intervening powermod, has code to write.
poal niggers keep asking why the drama always leaks over when self-policing is the law of the land. there's no mod intervention like poal leadership does. users fix their own problem.
the loli pedos got hunted and dogpiled by the userbase instead.
(post is archived)