stop putting words in my mouth.
you posted words claiming something wasnt legally CP so i dared you defend that opinion.
you didnt, thus your words are void.
yes or no, is it your opinion that naked pics of kids do not legally count as CP? that's what you claimed then, so yes or no, simple question
Dotard, I told you from the get-go that pictures of naked kids were covered under federal child pornography laws, and have stated as such since then.
no.
the matter in question was Aged, he posted what was clearly pedo pics where the kids kept their clothes on. you waded into that, made some legal claims, and everything became a shitshow.
you stated, despite knowing he posted pictures of real kids, that he shouldnt be banned for degenerate spamming of voats gaming sub iirc.
In that comment section where you solicited CP, you were asked by cameracode to define child pornography. When you initially failed to do so, I hounded through your pilpul because I assumed your definition of CP changes as you see fit, like how SJWs redefine racism to their own manipulative ends. You defined it as pictures of kids getting fucked, and I told you such a definition was inadequate. You got pissed and I replied that federal CP laws included pictures of naked kids. Because you only read what you want to see and view communication as a means of manipulation, you decided that soliciting CP I never had or will have was a great idea.
(post is archived)