According to the FBI’s criminal complaint, Miller is accused of being a felon who possessed a firearm on January 17, 2018.
They didnt find anything in their search so this is the best they could do. Pretty trumped up charge. Hopefully he can find atleast one lawyer in the country to represent him.
Pretty trumped up charge.
This is especially true since it was a local offense and should have been handled accordingly. The fact that the highest tax-payer funded law enforcement institution in this country was deployed to go after this is staggering. Just consider how many offenses of this same kind are processed in any major city as the result of blacks possessing illegal firearms. Every day. Are any of these being categorized under the label of domestic terrorism? Not one. These terms, like 'domestic terrorist' are just euphemisms for 'whites'. It's that simple.
Greenblatt literally took to Twitter after the arrest was made (in which a team of agents used stun grenades in Gyp's home) to brag about the fact his ADL was the primary instigator that mobilized the FBI to make the move.
In other words, a Jewish interest advocate NGO literally used America's highest law enforcement agency to take down a man who offended them with free speech. The FBI justified it by a retroactive appeal to a three year old charge that should have been handled locally.
It's not even up for debate anymore. The mask is off.
felon who possessed a firearm
Unconstitutional.
but muh it's sensible goy!!!
No. No it isn't.
shall not be infringed
Is not confusing.
Felons owning guns has been an issue I've flip-flopped on the most in my life, I think.
2nd Amendment, as you said, very clearly says SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It does not say "shall not be infringed, unless the individual is deemed to be a danger to society". It says "shall not be infringed". The men who wrote this spent weeks, who knows how many thousands of man-hours debating and working out the precise way to word these amendments so that future generations couldn't possibly confuse it.
And that's what they arrived at- "shall not be infringed". No caveats. Right now, I'm leaning towards "let felons have guns, they'll end up getting killed by a law-abiding citizen or police officer sooner rather than later." If everyone had guns, there would no doubt be some terrible murders.. but I think there would be more self-defense homicides. I think shitheads with guns would go extinct in a matter of years.
Instead, we take shitheads with guns and put them in prison for a little while. Then they come out, obtain guns/drugs again, and usually end up back in prison again. Rinse and repeat. If they were instead killed during their felony, this is a tremendous relief valve on the prison system.
Slightly unrelated tangent- who else thinks it should be like this: If you kill a burglar (or some other assailant, any person who attacks you or someone else, or your property), you should be entitled to everything that fucker owned. Any assets he had in life should be given to you, as you have been victimized and forced to kill someone. This would exclude their debts, of course- that would fall onto their family. A system like this could be abused... but it could also be a MASSIVE deterrent. If Tyrone knows that getting caught robbing a liquor store will get his shitty car seized and given to the store owner, maybe they'll think twice? Ah, who am I kidding, most niggers can't be bothered to think once.
If felons are to dangerous to own guns. Why are they not in prison?
The entire idea of "violent criminals shouldn't get guns" only has legs because of violent niggers, spics, chinks, sandjews and jews. Yet that isn't talked about.
To your tangent: kek, nod of approval.
If they were instead killed during their felony
A great many felonies are non-violent. That's how Whitey loses his access to guns.
Any assets he had in life should be given to you
I don't see this working, as I've had automobile incidents with nignogs and the lawyers + insurance companies always say that even if you could successfully sue for all the money that the darkie has, it wouldn't cover the cost of repairing the damages.
ya but look what a thin line we're walking now..if these people can make you a felon simply for wrong think then we're all in the same boat as this guy.
How is that a reply to me?
ZERO US Citizens should be forbidden from owning a firearm. The singular exception is criminally insane IIRC, that just means batshit crazy and doesn't derive any meaning from "criminally".
US Citzens
So about that...
Free
White
...
The easy way to explain this to retards:
If you're too dangerous to have access to a gun, then you're to dangerous to have access to knives, cars, poison, gasoline, etc. You need to be permanently incarcerated or executed.
You're too dangerous to have salt.
Salt ACTUALLY kills people and does so FAR MORE OFTEN than guns allegedly do.
He attended a firearms course.
Allegedly and that probably doesn't qualify as possession since you dont need to own a gun to attend one.
True. But idk Florida gun laws.
(post is archived)