You mean one of the jury at least, (the volunteer) was paid to fake it all?
What for? It would ruin the franchise, they don't need that particular guy for a gigantic audience and lots of views after all
Kriss Angel routinely paid off audience members, and had them sign non-disclosure agreements, for going along with shit at his shows. It's entertainment.
Maybe it's fake who knows
If it's real the implications don't destroy my conception of reality/"belief system" https://poal.co/s/Strange/397288/f98b70c4-9739-4221-a97b-86621319f49f#cmnts
If it's fake well, that's what it is then
Now there's no proof, one way or the other, until proven otherwise of course
And just because Mr "kriss angel" did fake shits at one point, doesn't mean this is the same story here. So this argument of yours is evidently not valid, on that we can agree. There's nothing personal here, we would be discussing another topic entirely, it would be the same logic at work. Just because mister X is a fraud doesn't prove mister Y is a fraud.
...
https://www.livescience.com/what-is-quantum-entanglement.html
Quantum entanglement is one of the uber-bizarre phenomena seen when things get itty-bitty, or inside the quantum realm. When two or more particles link up in a certain way, no matter how far apart they are in space, their states remain linked. That means they share a common, unified quantum state. So observations of one of the particles can automatically provide information about the other entangled particles, regardless of the distance between them. And any action to one of these particles will invariably impact the others in the entangled system.
This above, it's crazyshit territory already
At the same time, it's peanuts compared to what we will get access to, in terms of understanding of "reality", in let's say 1000 years from now (if we don't self destruct over the next decade of course)
I'm not trying to 'prove' anything. But if it's on TV, it's almost certainly (((entertainment))) until I know otherwise. Lots of people are desperate for attention ('I saw Bigfoot!'), or have a financial angle.
On the other hand, demonic possession would explain a lot. I am smart enough to know I don't have all the answers, and never will, and that's OK.
(post is archived)