The very fact that they are withholding the name of the shooter (even though everyone already knows it) and attempting to hide him is the strongest indicator that he was acting under orders from a higher authority. This is to protect whoever is above and behind him. Because if it was just one nigger, acting on his own impulses, they would have already sacrificed him. Because if he ever has to take the stand and give testimony under oath, that person will be revealed and that is the one thing they don't want.
The very fact that they are withholding the name of the shooter (even though everyone already knows it) and attempting to hide him is the strongest indicator that he was acting under orders from a higher authority.
Or they just don't want it out there that a retarded trigger happy anti-White nigger executed a White woman. The problem with the "kill anyone that crosses this line" narrative is Ashli Babbitt is the only one that was murdered, if such an order existed there would be more bodies. I'm not completely discounting the possibility of such an order, I just find it unlikely. And no, they will not sacrifice a nigger beholden to the system if it means breaking the "White supremacist terrorist" narrative they're attempting to push. If they ever put that nigger on the stand, which is highly unlikely, the nigger will lie and even if there is irrefutable evidence that the nigger perjured himself they will not pursue it.
(post is archived)