Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

714

(post is archived)

[–] • 20 pts

If they can prove that these guys were not rioting then it's a fair demand. However, at least one of them was participating in torching a building. He went after Rittenhouse because Rittenhouse thwarted that arson. So the prosecution is literally asking the court to bar evidence from being presented.

[–] • 6 pts (edited )

BS. They were already in a group of violent protestors who were setting fire to buildings. They were rioters. They then attacked kyle as a group forcing him to defend himself. He was guarding a business from these rooters. He was not hunting innocent protestors. Also, the rioters previous convictions provide context to deciding if they were rioters or innocent protestors. The video shows they were violent rioters attempting to murder Kyle.

[–] • 1 pt

He might get off considering he didn't kill any niggers.

[–] • 3 pts

They were pedo jews. His chances are worse than if they were black.

[–] • 0 pt

Well they can't be called "victims" or "rioters" and have to be referred to by last name. That doesn't seem unreasonable.

The prosecution is literally trying to bar evidence being presented as far as the cops handing out water to defenders. They ought not be allowed to do that.

[–] • 8 pts

violent

jewish

child rapists

wife abusers

drug addicts

There are enough to choose from but every prosecutor asking for such things is cucked or jewish.

[–] • 5 pts

The prosecutor ignored judge orders in the Floyd case and continued to call the defense team "liars". Nothing happened.

Remind me why Rittenhouse's team can't do the same?

[–] • 2 pts

In theory, you would be held in contempt of court. In practice, that's up to the judge.

[–] • 4 pts

Describe them as they really were, kikes and pedophiles. Problem solved.

[–] • 3 pts

'Judge Schlomostein, these kikes got what they deserved'

[–] • 3 pts

so 3 jewish pedophiles with records and violent histories cannot be named as what they are and a true Patriot who calmly surrendered to police after being violently attacked by a hateful, racist, communist and anti White mob of terrorists didn't act in self defense totally calm and collectively?

Not guilty.

Case closed you leftist faggots.

[–] • 1 pt

Rittenhouse didn't surrender, He sought out the police for his own protection from the mob and turned himself in to them. The police were down the street and left him to fend for himself. The whole videotaped incident shows Rittenhouse retreating. The mob was intentionally trying to attack him. One of them also pretended to be a medic and then pulled a gun. ANTIFA are the real domestic terrorists.

[–] • 0 pt

Yep. I wish he got more of those radical and leftist psychotics.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

"Domestic Terrorists".

[–] • 1 pt

"insurrectionists" - use the MK Ultra programing against the system "bands of violent thieves/arsonists"

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

okay. the defense will go with pedos and felons instead.

[–] • 2 pts

'But I can still call them 'jews', right?'

[–] • 1 pt

You do that and they'll hang you for being a goy with the audacity to shoot a chosen one.

[–] • 2 pts

Fair enough, they can be referred to as “armed jewish communist pederasts”, because that’s what those things are.

[–] • 1 pt

Ironically, by trying to suppress descriptions of the "victims", the prosecution could easily inadvertently open up the door to the defense being allowed to include character evidence of these "victims". If the prosecution fucks up and describes the purported character of these supposed "victims", such as calling them "good people", or "peaceful protesters", that would open the door for the defense to bring in character evidence against them to show to the jury that the portrayal of the "victims" by the prosecution was.... inaccurate. This could result in things like the "victims" extensive criminal histories becoming part of the evidence. Presently, it is excluded since Kyle had no knowledge of these people or their criminal histories, it was irrelevant to the events of the night. However, if the prosecution tries to portray them as whiter than the driven snow, that will open the door.

[–] • 1 pt

Refer to them as communist faggots and sex offenders

Load more (10 replies)