If they can prove that these guys were not rioting then it's a fair demand. However, at least one of them was participating in torching a building. He went after Rittenhouse because Rittenhouse thwarted that arson. So the prosecution is literally asking the court to bar evidence from being presented.
BS. They were already in a group of violent protestors who were setting fire to buildings. They were rioters. They then attacked kyle as a group forcing him to defend himself. He was guarding a business from these rooters. He was not hunting innocent protestors. Also, the rioters previous convictions provide context to deciding if they were rioters or innocent protestors. The video shows they were violent rioters attempting to murder Kyle.
Well they can't be called "victims" or "rioters" and have to be referred to by last name. That doesn't seem unreasonable.
The prosecution is literally trying to bar evidence being presented as far as the cops handing out water to defenders. They ought not be allowed to do that.
(post is archived)