32 years worth of fake reports? Not just the occasional screwup?
Yeah, that's deliberate to a huge degree.
is there any direct monetary value to doing that? does it save the company money?
because if its not about money directly its about undermining the navy.
Steel making is a sensitive process, just watch that knife making show a few times and then imagine that on an industrial scale. Temperatures, carbon content, oxidization, impurities, casting/forging... all of that has to be controlled and if it's fucked up you have to scrap it and start all over again.
yeah i get that but im thinking less actual material therefore something saved somewhere or shes taken a slice out of materials theyre charging for and not buying, then faking strength tests to make it appear the product is a stronger product with more material.
i think that makes sense.
I consider it sabotage.
It could absolutely save them money by allowing them to fulfill their obligation to the Navy with inferior batches of steel, rather than having to make new batches that actually pass the tests and then find a buyer for the failed batch.
It's just run of the mill femoid laziness.
(post is archived)