Apparently I count as more than one person?
Anyway. You may be right, but I don't think so.
I don't get the impression Kyle is a psychopath.
Even if you're right, I still think Kyle is a nigger brain, because I value honor, don't suck anyone's cock no matter how much money you get, especially not BLM's.
I don't think giving an inch to the left is ever helpful. Don't speak their language, don't share their premises, don't clear your throat, don't ever be ashamed of being viciously anti-left, pro-white and so forth.
That's why you can't win. You should never be honorable with dishonorable people.
General Washington crossed the Delaware River on Christmas morning slaughtering the British in their beds.
Honor is seized through victory not bestowed upon you.
I don't disagree with that if the cause is important enough, I think one has to treat one's enemies like shit sometimes if they are evil and destroy the world.
But I don't see the similarity with the Rittenhouse situation. He says he support BLM. I think he means what he says. I do not think that he has the annihilation of the left as his goal. That's gut feeling.
The problem is that I can only know what I see, the rest is theoretical. I judge him by what he factually does, and not by what he may or may not be doing in a theorerical future.
I look at the basic reality that he is going to be inside court rooms a lot over the next few years and a good character alibi with quotes of him endorsing his attackers will go a long way swaying any jury pool to his side.
I personally don't agree with the tactic but it is a not a stupid move and it is not an accident.
(post is archived)