WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

665

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Won't pass constitutional muster. The court will strike it down if it passes, but I can't imagine a bunch of law making lawyers will pass a law that gets lawyers in trouble for prosecuting people.

Qualified immunity is used by the legal system to protect prosecutors and ensure they aren't pressured to drop cases.

[–] 0 pt

Qualified immunity ends the second constitutional rights are violated. It is by definition constitutional. Malicious prosecution is already a crime.

[–] 0 pt

Prosecuting someone that a judge has determined there was probable cause to warrant is not a rights violation. If the prosecutor lied about evidence at a probable cause hearing, that would be one thing, but trying to get a conviction on a weak case is not going to be grounds for a prosecutor getting pinched.

[–] 0 pt

Say it with me, Malicious prosecution. The fact a crime exists invalidates your position in its entirety. That's why it exists.

[–] 0 pt

Malicious prosecution is already a crime

And as rare as the Amur Leopard!

[–] 0 pt

Which is entirely a different issue. Thus the law.