He did not say that. He said there are more serious sins than "sins of the flesh".
>“Sins of the flesh are not the most serious,” the 84-year-old religious leader said regarding sex outside of marriage. Top transgressions instead include pride and hatred
I really don't like Francis, but at least get your criticism of him correct. This doesn't mean "sins of the flesh" aren't serious, just that there are some sins that are more serious than that. Also, he was speaking about a priest who resigned because he gave a massage to a woman (not even sex, just a massage).
Of course hatered will make the list. Everyone knows that means the sin of being White.
I'll admit I didn't watch or read the whole thing, but even with context it sounds like certain things are implied by his statement.
I really don't like Francis, but at least get your criticism of him correct. This doesn't mean "sins of the flesh" aren't serious, just that there are some sins that are more serious than that. Also, he was speaking about a priest who resigned because he gave a massage to a woman (not even sex, just a massage).
Upgroat. The previous pope stated that the Church had done so much good for people that the priests molesting children was ok....
>The previous pope stated that the Church had done so much good for people that the priests molesting children was ok...
reference please?
(post is archived)