That's why its a difficult opinion to argue but their point has nothing to do with pollution as much as resource management.
Hunter-Gathers collect and hunt all they can with no thought of sustainability. This completely depletes the resources of an area.
Localizing food supply, which your group produces year and year again, means you aren't hunting animals to extinction (mammoths, giant sloths) or over foraging and wiping out plant populations.
Humans got to good at being hunter-gathers and needed to change strategy into something more sustainable.
Stop right there, they have exactly zero point
Animals, are hunter gatherers, period
Take the squirrel take the wolves
Now you're telling me, the animal "kingdom", is depleting the planet? You're telling me that natural cycles are bad to manage the environment?
Since when?
Never, they form the most virtuous cycle known to man, when it comes to "sustainability"
....
Hunter gatherers didn't build hostpitals and universities and shit
They ride horses, at best, and live in tents or mud huts, at best
Of course they deplete at one area, but then they move on, and the vegetables and animals in the area grow/come back.
I mean if hunter gatherers were ever a problem for the environment.. Then the whole animal kingdom is one too
Which is evidently a completely bankrupt concept
This piece in the OP is only there to promote "unabatted liberalism, trust the plan, plunder the planet all you want, all hail capitalism free market and shit, we got everything right let's continue"
Squirrels and wolves did not develop tools which made them far outclass every other animal on the planet in efficiency.
Plants don't grow back if you harvest all their fruit. Animals down repopulate if the're completely wiped out, which H-G groups did.
You can't always just move on as populations grows and you get locked between other groups who want to protect their resources, which can put a further strain on an area.
>Squirrels and wolves did not develop tools which made them far outclass every other animal on the planet in efficiency.
We are talking about "hunter gatherers", this https://duckduckgo.com/?q=hunter+gatherers&atb=v191-3__&iax=images&ia=images
https://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/field/image/Dark-Skin-and-Blue-Eyes.jpg
Now don't bring their tools on the table as if this made any fundamental difference in terms of pollution, ecause it's just total none sense for OBVIOUS reasons
We're talking about spears and rocks here, not fucking space rockets
...
>Plants don't grow back if you harvest all their fruit. Animals down repopulate if the're completely wiped out, which H-G groups did.
Tell me again how birds and bees aren't a factor here you have totally overlooked
Tell me again how hunter gatherers are going to overpopulate any given area without hospitals, schools and shit
They won't, because they die a lot
So their numbers are never going to o over the top as we can see in africa with white man intervention, period
So again, pretending industry preserved the environment against hunter gatherers is a joke, a total joke, an literal intellectual fraud
(post is archived)