Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

1) They can't confiscate firearms passively.

Most of the left imposes their tyranny at arm's length, remotely from Silicon Valley, state capitols, and DC. Someone has to come and get the firearms from the populace.

2) It's much easier to resist passively.

Rather than having to donate, show up and protest, vote, evade taxes, etc. all that must be done to rebel is not to comply. And nobody likes being stolen from.

#1) They can't confiscate firearms passively. Most of the left imposes their tyranny at arm's length, remotely from Silicon Valley, state capitols, and DC. Someone has to come and get the firearms from the populace. #2) It's much easier to resist passively. Rather than having to donate, show up and protest, vote, evade taxes, etc. all that must be done to rebel is not to comply. And nobody likes being stolen from.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Firearm confiscation or forced vaccination.

[–] • 3 pts

my DNA belongs to me

sadly we never got around to figuring out that our natural rights are to be protected by our government and not "given"

[–] • 2 pts

I hate it when retards act like we only have the right to defend ourselves and our homeland because the 2A says we do. I have always viewed the violation of natural rights as the litmus test for when I no longer have any moral obligation to comply.

[–] • 2 pts

This is the point I was trying (and failing) to make in another thread yesterday. The 2A doesn't grant us the right to defend ourselves. All it does is formally put the government on notice and make them agree in writing that we can and will.

[–] • 1 pt

this used to be the case for most of the country's history. we just never wrote it down and so whoosh there it went

[–] • 1 pt

Nothing is given; everything is taken. It’s common fucking sense that the rules only apply because we collectively agree they do. The government has no special property that grants it the ability to magically impose some universal law upon its citizens - in the final analysis, force is all that matters.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

how can they take something they don't even know exists? bury it, have a boating accident, buy off the books, whatever it takes. leave no trace.

[–] • 0 pt

Exactly! They'll try though. I imagine torture of likely possessors of firearms.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

how can they try if they're oblivious?

[–] • 0 pt

Just like in Turner Diaries. Ineffectively

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No, hangry wins.

I'm amazed at how many people don't know the world is fucked for food.

[–] • 1 pt

The war is hot now. Just because bullets aren't being used doesn't mean we aren't in a full blown war. War is tactical. When you choose to see the tactics being used against us, there is only one conclusion: we are enemies of corporations. It is corporations against the world's population. I see no other conclusion.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt