Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

1) They can't confiscate firearms passively.

Most of the left imposes their tyranny at arm's length, remotely from Silicon Valley, state capitols, and DC. Someone has to come and get the firearms from the populace.

2) It's much easier to resist passively.

Rather than having to donate, show up and protest, vote, evade taxes, etc. all that must be done to rebel is not to comply. And nobody likes being stolen from.

#1) They can't confiscate firearms passively. Most of the left imposes their tyranny at arm's length, remotely from Silicon Valley, state capitols, and DC. Someone has to come and get the firearms from the populace. #2) It's much easier to resist passively. Rather than having to donate, show up and protest, vote, evade taxes, etc. all that must be done to rebel is not to comply. And nobody likes being stolen from.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] • 1 pt

Nothing is given; everything is taken. It’s common fucking sense that the rules only apply because we collectively agree they do. The government has no special property that grants it the ability to magically impose some universal law upon its citizens - in the final analysis, force is all that matters.