WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

I've noticed that a good deal of the people defending Q-followers are depicting the doubters/skeptics as if they:

  • have no faith
  • hate the concept of hope
  • get off on dispelling others of their hope
  • were a bunch of black-pilled cynics
  • were a bunch of bullies that want to hate others for no other reason than to hate

On the contrary, imagine that you work in the healthcare field. You have a patient whose results have just come back from the radiologist. There are massive tumors throughout the brain, which are inoperable. You know this person has around six months to live.

As the person who is in control of what information that patient receives, what is the most moral choice you could make? Should you conceal that information and let this individual live in ignorance of their fate? Or, should you tell this person exactly what is coming?

We'd think that if terminal illness was a matter of fact, it would be better to tell this person the facts. They might like to do some things that were important to them, which they might neglect to do without this knowledge. They may wish to see certain people and generally alter their priorities for the six remaining months of their life.

I'm saying that when it comes to Q, a lot of us haven't been 'making fun' of Q-followers for the sole purpose of having a go at them. Most of us believe that we can see these people getting their hopes up for something that is going to let them down massively, and it would be better to tell them that the case is terminal. This way, they can prepare for what is really coming. If not, the let down from this hopium is going to act like being hit by a fucking freight train.

Allowing someone a fairly innocuous fantasy is one thing. We don't think it's that important to tell our friend they are a little too heavy for their outfit, if we see that they are currently feeling very confident about themselves. It's not a bubble worth bursting.

But some bubbles are worth it to burst, when we see that the wishful thinking has transcended a short-lived fancy, and has become something on which a person has balanced their hopes for life and the future. That isn't an act of hatred or bullying, even though it might feel negative at the time it's being said. It's an authentically considerate act.

Where cases of antagonizing the Q community have come up, I think a great deal of it has arisen from frustration on the part of people who realize its falsehood. They are trying to give the news about the terminal illness, but the patient is refusing to hear it. At some point, some individuals transition from care to mockery. The danger in this is that the mockery is often taken by believers as some vague reason to solidify their wishful thinking - the 'shill' effect.

If the Q predictions wound up being true, I'd be the first to kiss your asses. Keeping with the analogy, I'd resign from my job at the hospital, pronto. But we don't live our lives by making decisions that take seriously the most miraculous and unlikely outcomes. The person with terminal cancer, given news about having six months remaining, would be unwise to spend the next six months as if their belief that a miracle is going to happen is infallibly true.

I've noticed that a good deal of the people defending Q-followers are depicting the doubters/skeptics as if they: - have no faith - hate the concept of hope - get off on dispelling others of their hope - were a bunch of black-pilled cynics - were a bunch of bullies that want to hate others for no other reason than to hate On the contrary, imagine that you work in the healthcare field. You have a patient whose results have just come back from the radiologist. There are massive tumors throughout the brain, which are inoperable. You know this person has around six months to live. As the person who is in control of what information that patient receives, what is the most moral choice you could make? Should you conceal that information and let this individual live in ignorance of their fate? Or, should you tell this person exactly what is coming? We'd think that if terminal illness was a matter of fact, it would be better to tell this person the facts. They might like to do some things that were important to them, which they might neglect to do without this knowledge. They may wish to see certain people and generally alter their priorities for the six remaining months of their life. I'm saying that when it comes to Q, a lot of us haven't been 'making fun' of Q-followers for the sole purpose of having a go at them. Most of us believe that we can see these people getting their hopes up for something that is going to let them down massively, and it would be better to tell them that the case is terminal. This way, they can prepare for what is really coming. If not, the let down from this hopium is going to act like being hit by a fucking freight train. Allowing someone a fairly innocuous fantasy is one thing. We don't think it's that important to tell our friend they are a little too heavy for their outfit, if we see that they are currently feeling very confident about themselves. It's not a bubble worth bursting. But some bubbles are worth it to burst, when we see that the wishful thinking has transcended a short-lived fancy, and has become something on which a person has balanced their hopes for life and the future. That isn't an act of hatred or bullying, even though it might feel negative at the time it's being said. It's an authentically considerate act. Where cases of antagonizing the Q community have come up, I think a great deal of it has arisen from frustration on the part of people who realize its falsehood. They are *trying* to give the news about the terminal illness, but the patient is refusing to hear it. At some point, some individuals transition from *care* to mockery. The danger in this is that the mockery is often taken by believers as some vague reason to solidify their wishful thinking - the 'shill' effect. If the Q predictions wound up being true, I'd be the first to kiss your asses. Keeping with the analogy, I'd resign from my job at the hospital, pronto. But we don't live our lives by making decisions that take seriously the most miraculous and unlikely outcomes. The person with terminal cancer, given news about having six months remaining, would be unwise to spend the next six months *as if* their belief that a miracle is going to happen is infallibly true.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You are confusing hope and expectation.

I follow Q, have since nearly the beginning, was maybe 3 months behind when I was turned onto it. There has been enough there to warrant that hope, especially being someone who has read ALL of the drops. I was fortunate enough to have been following this in "real-time" for such a long time that I got to see a lot of things just scrubbed right out of existence (like when Rachel Chandler's IG profile was still public. The shit her and her followers were posting, damn, it was crazy shit man.).

The anti-Q crowd is just illogical; their immense butthurt at people who share a common ground but disagree on solutions plays too well into the oppositions hands to be organic. Most of their arguments are actually in Q drops, so it's as if they haven't actually read them all, which makes us believe that their sources are MSM or obvious gatekeepers (Icke anyone?). And if they aren't reading all the Q drops then that definitely means they were never following this in real-time and therefore don't have access to many of the things that were posted years ago that were absolutely explosive.

Their main complaint is always not "naming the Jew", that's their biggest butthurt I'm seeing. Again, illogical. If Q would have "named the Jew" at ANY point, in ANY drop, that would have been it; game over, the MSM would have highlighted that one drop ad nauseam, they would have played their "literally Hitler!", "anti-semite!", "Q is a Nazi, white-supremacist hate group!", then Trump would have had to disavow and there goes waking up any kind of normies. This also again proves that these people have never read through all the drops, because he does "name the Jew" in the most brilliant way, the best way to assure an awakening and bring fence sitters and "moderates" into the fray; by uncovering their crimes. Now the people are awakened to a global syndicate of human traffickers that use people as cattle and participate in ancient Pagan ceremonies where they make blood sacrifices, and worse. But apparently to our anti-Q friends an even more successful approach to waking up as many moderates as you can is to immediately blame Jews for being Jewish and exclaiming how evil they are (normies won't buy that shit) and how they are a "global syndicate of human traffickers that use people as cattle and participate in ancient Pagan ceremonies where they make blood sacrifices".

So, from our point of view, people who bash us are either:

Are straight shills, because it's their job.

Are straight trolls, because they exist to stir the pot, they don't really have an emotional investment either way, they just like to argue.

Are people who LOVE gatekeepers and fawn over Alex Jones and jerk off to Probably Alexandra on YouTube. More worried about the Earth being flat, or the invasion of the lizard people from the middle of the hollow, and somehow flat Earth. They have no more real concrete evidence to justify their own "conspiracy theory" beliefs than people who follow Q; it's like Big Foot believers getting mad at Loch Ness monster truthers.

Are people who either,

A) Have done very little actual research for themselves on Qanon, as in read EVERY single drop and followed every link in said drops to the source research or direction that particular drop was used for. And like I said if you decided to do this research late in the game you aren't privy to A LOT of what has been scrubbed; thousands of twitter links to good digs are gone, links to websites of even MSM articles contradicting themselves are gone, access to once public social media accounts of VERY obvious child traffickers is gone. You aren't working with the same info we have been working with because it no longer exists.

B) Former legit followers that just became cynical at deltafagging and nothing come in from it because they are an impatient person that requires instant gratification.

C) People who are just set in their beliefs and will never sway from them; they have decided what their reality is and it MUST be that way to everyone else as well or they get angry.

Still, hope is not expectation. I HOPE all this Q stuff plays out, I HOPE Qanon is real, for the better of the world as a whole. I EXPECT nothing. Losing your expectations is something that took me years to grasp, because this is something to practice in life in general.

And no offense but your analogy is just shit. It's your doctor's job to be up front and honest with you. Telling someone who has 2 weeks to live that they have 6 months is a bad idea because they may put off things they would have liked to in those 2 weeks because they thought they had more time like "oh I'll wait until next month to see my grandchildren". That's not your call to make, there is nothing noble about it, are you their psychiatrist? Is lying something commonly ok with you when it's from your doctor? Then you are comparing the sacred relationship between a doctor and his patient to a group of what's basically complete strangers, as in the opinion of a complete stranger is supposed to matter to me especially when those strangers rarely want to have an actual debate about any specific drop of qanon and usually just start with name calling general point/laugh routine.

So I tell you what..You want to hate on Qanon? Fine, you have that right, I understand that, but instead of the generalized attacks how about you guys start telling us which drops you have a problem with. Show us where he is what you claim he is. Show us the pro-israel, pro-marxist drops you claim exist. If you want to debate about it then bring something to the table other than ad hominem bullshit.

I mean for the love of God these guys have such BIG brain hot takes like this:

"The most damage they are doing right now is telling people NOT to protest at the inauguration."

Glow a little brighter there buddy.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You want to hate on Qanon?

I'm telling you right now that it would help your cause a lot more if you weren't playing up the victim card. Did you honestly read my post, or the title even? There is no way to construe what I said in that post as hatred, but part of what keeps this in-group dynamic alive is identifying enemy groups. I have to be an enemy shill because you categorize everyone according to that binary. It's horseshit.

"The most damage they are doing right now is telling people NOT to protest at the inauguration."

That's not my claim.

You are confusing hope and expectation.

There is a far better case that you are. Hope would be, "Gee, it would sure be nice if Trump were orchestrating something behind the scenes to correct this course we're on. I guess we'll see." Q makes predictions. Let's not attempt to gaslight anybody here, and pretend that Q has not made concrete predictions, down to the day and to the nature of the event that was supposed to take place. Those days have all come, they've all passed, and those things didn't take place. There was a time I had hope that Q was true, until November 2017 when Q made a big to do about some operation that was going down over the weekend (I cannot remember which weekend). I happened to be in Milwaukee over the weekend, and I remember clearly that advert in the the NYT, I believe, about the riots that were going to take place. I vaguely remember the Q drops talking about forces being mobilized and everything that was supposed to go down. Hilary was supposed to be arrested. Nothing fucking happened.

A prediction creates an expectation.

Their main complaint is always not "naming the Jew"

I think you are setting up some straw men here, including this and the Alex Jones bit. Do you honestly think that the main complaint people have about Q is the absence of the JQ? Come on. You're pretending.

The main reason people have doubted Q is because whoever is responsible for these drops has made egregiously wrong predictions, time and again. Don't get me wrong. These aren't the only complaints. However, as you have demonstrated, the other major complaints can be argued away with coherent reasoning. For example, the condescending and infuriating way that, for four years, Q has continued to talk in code so as to get people to invest time connecting dots, instead of just being straight with people. That's a major red flag, but it can be reasoned away: "Q has to talk in code in order to maintain cover."

Everything can be reasoned away except where Q has put his dick on the table and made concrete claims/predictions.

The reason people lost faith, and why they are trying to get you to see this is bullshit, is because none of those predictions has come true. Instead, they've all been false, and yet we see time and again the following process occur:

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/249143/d74943e2-493b-41e8-bc43-1fb8ec140260

Once we've seen this cycle occur enough times, we clue in.

So, from our point of view, people who bash us are either:

Or, it's like I said in my post. Many of us just see pathological things going on, and we care enough to say something. I established that some people get so frustrated with the inanity of it that they begin to mock or bash you. That's bound to happen past a certain stage, i.e. when you continue to pursue and promulgate ideas that have proven themselves to be false. You should also consider that many conservatives have another reason to resent Q: its obvious inanity means it can easily be used by the mainstream media to discredit conservatives generally. In other words, there comes a point where it makes things more difficult for us to 'have you associated with our team.'

And no offense but your analogy is just shit.

I didn't think it was too bad.

Fine, you have that right, I understand that, but instead of the generalized attacks how about you guys start telling us which drops you have a problem with.

You keep suggesting that it is not possible to know whether Q is false or not until we've read every drop. That's just not true. Now, I'm a religious believer, but I would never say that someone needs to read every single word of the Bible before they are able to argue it's false (if that is what they believe). That's nonsense.

I don't have the time or the inclination to go and discover exactly what number was attached to any of the drops that make the failed predictions. It is sufficient that I know they exist, and plenty of other people know generally what I'm referring to, including you. There have been wrong predictions made many times for a number of years. That is enough to discredit the idea and the credibility of Q.