Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

Some starting suggestions:

DNCL: DNC Lite.

Koolaid Democrats (red like the koolaid man, but accepting them is like committing suicide)

Petting Zoo Republicans: Because they're all donkeys.

White Rinos: Plays on race politics, make ot obvious to those in the party that the party is dead/dying and signals to the rats to jump ship, hastening its demise at a time the DNC needs the GOP for a little while longer to draw people back into the uniparty hoax.

Grandstanding Old Party

Give-it-all-away-to Oligarchs Party

Pussicrats Republicans

Yellow Rinos - because they give it away to the ccp, and also because they essentially always lose or fail sooner or later.

Romney-ites.

Grand Old Pussicrats.

Blinkers - because they always backdown, conveniently fail, or compromise at the last minute.

NPP - new progressive party (republicans), as opposed to the old progressive party (democrats)

Nigger Patrol Party - fuck it, call the GOP racist, isolate the stupid, half hearted, and timid, the ones beholden to the media. Make the media eat the weak in the GOP. Like attaching leeches to an open wound. Scare off the faggots and traitors, make it so radioactive of an environment the only thing left is a hardened core of political survivors in the GOP. The message should be "fight for US or watch your political career DIE."

Rebranding them and destroying the GOP as a party should be a top priority. Force them to fight or at least show their allegiance. The uniparty's legitimacy, whats left of the left-vs-right fake infighting has to be stomped out before they can drag the public back into it again.

There has to be a final, greater crisis of legitimacy in the GOP, one larger than ever before.

I'm not talking about lighting a fire under their ass. I'm talking about getting them to pick up proverbial pitchforks and metaphorically tying their fellow congressmen/senators/governors/mayors to fucking stakes as it were. A metaphorical "purge" of the party so thorough, that out of the ash, we get the refined gold of ardent 'bloodthirsty' anticommunists and antimarxists. The party motto must now become "traitors before enemies."

There should be no middle ground. None.

And it starts with rebranding them.

Some starting suggestions: DNCL: DNC Lite. Koolaid Democrats (red like the koolaid man, but accepting them is like committing suicide) Petting Zoo Republicans: Because they're all donkeys. White Rinos: Plays on race politics, make ot obvious to those in the party that the party is dead/dying and signals to the rats to jump ship, hastening its demise at a time the DNC **needs** the GOP for a little while longer to draw people back into the uniparty hoax. Grandstanding Old Party Give-it-all-away-to Oligarchs Party Pussicrats Republicans Yellow Rinos - because they give it away to the ccp, and also because they essentially always lose or fail sooner or later. Romney-ites. Grand Old Pussicrats. Blinkers - because they always backdown, conveniently fail, or compromise at the last minute. NPP - new progressive party (republicans), as opposed to the old progressive party (democrats) Nigger Patrol Party - fuck it, call the GOP racist, isolate the stupid, half hearted, and timid, the ones beholden to the media. Make the media eat the weak in the GOP. Like attaching leeches to an open wound. Scare off the faggots and traitors, make it so radioactive of an environment the only thing left is a hardened core of political survivors in the GOP. The message should be "fight for US or watch your political career DIE." Rebranding them and destroying the GOP as a party should be a top priority. Force them to fight or at least show their allegiance. The uniparty's legitimacy, whats left of the left-vs-right fake infighting has to be stomped out before they can drag the public back into it again. There has to be a final, **greater** crisis of legitimacy in the GOP, one larger than ever before. I'm not talking about lighting a fire under their ass. I'm talking about getting *them* to pick up proverbial pitchforks and metaphorically **tying their fellow congressmen/senators/governors/mayors** to fucking stakes as it were. A metaphorical "purge" of the party so **thorough**, that out of the ash, we get the refined gold of ardent 'bloodthirsty' anticommunists and antimarxists. The party motto must now become "traitors before enemies." There should be no middle ground. None. And it starts with rebranding them.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Everyone has such detailed thoughts and explanations. I just call them as I see them. Traitors.

[–] • 1 pt

Everyone has such detailed thoughts and explanations. I just call them as I see them. Traitors.

You're plain spoken. I like you.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

All of this started back on August 17th 1790 with a letter to George Washington from Moses Seixas....the New World was destined for Jewish defeat from that day on. Until the Goyim can depart from his suicidal compassion the jews will always rule....I say give the kike something he'll never forget....a real holocaust.

[–] • 0 pt

What’s wrong with the good ol’ “RINO?”

Nicholas J. Fuentes likes to call them “Conservative Inc.” to symbolize their loyalty to special interest donors.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

What’s wrong with the good ol’ “RINO?”

Because it gives the other GOP a good out. The utility of a label is not to silence opposition. It's to legitimize further and stronger labels. Its a sort of 'forcing' of the narrative or window of discussion in one direction. And if you aren't actively pushing it right, then it will stray and ossify toward the left.

Which is why RINOs are able to escape by simply criticizing and grandstanding against other RINOs. The label ossified, like a gun that rusts for lack of use. New labels are a way of "oiling and maintaining the weapon" as it were.

Conservative Inc is very subtle though. Ultimately the out will be for them to claim to be "more progressive" republicans, either through their actual words or the policies they support. They just escape to the left (in practice and policy position), while no meaningful push on the right is made to purge these 'softer' elements from the party.

Just as a message, if it isn't explicitly right, becomes left, so too do labels and parties.

It is necessary to stand for something, but not sufficient. The GOP has been too chummy with the left for too long. Their excuse for escaping the 'chopping block' of public denunciation has always been "changing times / optics!". They've always stood for something, but never against anything in any meaningful capacity. "meaningful capacity" means not intentionally or conveniently failing any time they try to stop a new policy or social trend/social change started by the left.

A party that stands for something, but doesn't stand strongly against something, will never survive in the long term as anything but eventual pawns against any party that both stands for AND against something.

[–] • 0 pt

I recommend just Jews enforcement party. Keep in simple

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I recommend just Jews enforcement party. Keep in simple

Thats all well and good, but its not a message your average person will spread so its no go.

Maybe Corporate Enforcement Party. Bank Enforcement Party, Democrat Enforcement Party, Left Enforcement Party (LEP, or LEPER lo).

Corporate Communist Party.

Rights allergic to the communist label and will work as diligently to avoid it as being labelled racist. It should be made more radioactive than the term 'racist'.

[–] • 0 pt

This.... is why we can't have nice things.
Funny how BLM and No justice no peace etc have a very politically correct ring to it.

If you can't speak truth you have no Freedoms .

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

If you can't speak truth you have no Freedoms .

Sooner or later you have no freedoms, yes.

Freedoms we do have in some limited form, and we have to exercise those thoroughly where we can.

Remember: if you are stripped of everything, go to jail, or die.

You lose.

The first most important rule of war, political or militant, doesn't matter what, is: when outnumbered or the enemy has better logistics and tools, survival comes first.

You can't win if you're dead.

So you don't give the enemy an excuse to use unlimited force against you. You make them use unlimited force without justification because that hurts them. You don't give the state the excuse or justification to use its resources against you, because they have unlimited resources compared to you. You don't alienate the public wherever possible, because they are your resources and recruiting pool and message magnifier all rolled into one. You never commit to a fight where there is the chance of decisive defeat, because for every person, from the guy just following orders to the guy on the ground leading them, for all they know, it may come down to just them. For all they know, everyone else is captured and someone has to keep it going until they can get fresh recruits/supporters.

The model is cancer: elude destruction, evade defeat, spread the message, grow as fast as physically possible, undermine your enemies and their political support, sow doubt, and destabalize them politically and economically until they can't pay their own cronies and enforcers any more.

Finally, step in to bring order, when the power vacuum creates chaos.