WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

340

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

They lost all legitimacy.

Yes its a win to have a ruling that says registration and licensing fees are illegal. However, that doesn't mean we should support the courts. Because realistically this is them trying to still stay legitimate and relevant. And if anyone points to this and says "see, we do have our rights!", they are 1. legitimizing all the previous offenses that the illegitimate courts imposed. 2. signalling that its okay when the court thinks its recovered its reputation, to go back to its old crimes against the nation.

When frankly the lot of them deserve a fuck ton of prison time or worse at the hands of the military or other.

[–] 1 pt

User name checks out.

;-)

The USSC is a shell of what it was originally and nothing like the bulwark against the Legislative branch that it was intended to be.

[–] 1 pt

Hey, its the Professor! Good to see you man.

The USSC is a shell of what it was originally and nothing like the bulwark against the Legislative branch that it was intended to be.

What would you do?

  1. Make most courts elected positions, on the theory if people aren't happy with how enforcement is handled, they can toss out bad judges?

  2. make it a long-term/unelected position, on the theory the public would be manipulated into selecting bad judges?

  3. something else.

[–] 0 pt
  1. something else.

Stockpile ammunition, food, water, and durable goods that would likely be valuable in a barter economy.
I really don't think there's a way to fix the system anymore; especially from within the system itself.