If the cop who chit Ashley Babbit isn’t charged because he didn’t willfully break the law, then Kimberly porter shouldn’t be charged either.

587

•

The DOJ concluded:

“The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.”

Meaning that since she meant to tase him instead of shooting, it can be concluded she didn’t willingly commit a violation.

The DOJ concluded: “The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.” Meaning that since she meant to tase him instead of shooting, it can be concluded she didn’t willingly commit a violation.

[–] • 3 pts

We need to know the name of the nigger cop who shot Ashli Babbitt. Every other cop who shoots a nigger is exposed in the media. This fucker needs to be exposed.

link

[–] • 0 pt

In a sane world he'd be lynched

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

http://redpilled.ca/redpilled-media-exclusive-us-capitol-special-agent-david-bailey-who-murdered-ashli-babbitt-is-a-brazilian-immigrant-and-black-lives-matter-militant-he-repeatedly-threatened-to-kill-trump-su/

There are conflicting reports, but this one makes the most sense why they wouldn’t release the name.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

People keep trying to use logic to explain the actions of this government and why it's wrong. They aren't pretending to be logical. They are doing just the fuck what they want to do because they know we're not going to do anything about it.

link

[–] • 0 pt

You aren’t understanding the script

link

[–] • 0 pt

The cases aren't quite equivalent for one. Kimberley Porter cannot be charged with murder 1 as there is video footage of her believing she was tazing. This puts it into criminal negligence or manslaughter territory.

Capitol building: holy shit that DoJ conclusion is mealy mouthed and full of negatives but essentially the guard was given a gun with the expectation he made need to use it in defense of yada yada. He wasn't necessarily criminally negligent as he shot with full intent in the line of his duty.

Personally I think he is a fag for putting a round in Ms Babbit but not necessarily a criminal.