WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

970

The DOJ concluded:

“The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.”

Meaning that since she meant to tase him instead of shooting, it can be concluded she didn’t willingly commit a violation.

The DOJ concluded: “The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.” Meaning that since she meant to tase him instead of shooting, it can be concluded she didn’t willingly commit a violation.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Shot, not chit- dammit.

[–] 0 pt

You can edit within 2hrs of posting... I think.