Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

982

The fact that anti-gun advocates like Millhiser are describing the Court’s decision to accept NYSPRA v. Corlett in such apocalyptic terms is telling, as is the silence from gun control organizations on their social media in the hours after th

Theres another reason they may be silent: Because they know they have this in the bag.

And once they get a ruling they want, maybe even one that goes much further in its implications, they'll resort to "the supreme court is the law of the land!"

Remember if you're sitting on your hands and thinking we have this in the bag, you've essentially given your consent to whatever they finally rule.

I do not consent to be governed.

> The fact that anti-gun advocates like Millhiser are describing the Court’s decision to accept NYSPRA v. Corlett in such apocalyptic terms is telling, as is the silence from gun control organizations on their social media in the hours after th Theres another reason they may be silent: Because they know they have this in the bag. And once they get a ruling they want, maybe even one that goes *much further* in its implications, they'll resort to "the supreme court is the law of the land!" Remember if you're sitting on your hands and thinking we have this in the bag, you've essentially given your consent to whatever they finally rule. I do not consent to be governed.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

The Supreme Court is as corrupt as the rest of the gov't. I'll respect the law as much as they do....

[–] • 1 pt

I'll respect the highest law more than they do. Shall not be infringed means what it says, regardless of how high a court tramples on it and contorts its meaning.

[–] • 1 pt

I'll respect the law as much as they do.

Well said.

[–] • 2 pts

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

[–] • 2 pts

The constitution is enforced by the people onto the government. Because the very nature of the constitution is to be a list of rules for the government. To let the government interpret the meaning of the rules that are supposed to limit it is the same as asking a guy who just killed someone in cold blood to define the legal term murder. Only support the decision if it goes in our favor. That's how the dems play the game anyway and all's fair in war.

[–] • 2 pts

Only support the decision if it goes in our favor. That's how the dems play the game anyway and all's fair in war.

Hell yeah. We reserve the right to say no!