The fact that anti-gun advocates like Millhiser are describing the Court’s decision to accept NYSPRA v. Corlett in such apocalyptic terms is telling, as is the silence from gun control organizations on their social media in the hours after th
Theres another reason they may be silent: Because they know they have this in the bag.
And once they get a ruling they want, maybe even one that goes much further in its implications, they'll resort to "the supreme court is the law of the land!"
Remember if you're sitting on your hands and thinking we have this in the bag, you've essentially given your consent to whatever they finally rule.
I do not consent to be governed.
> The fact that anti-gun advocates like Millhiser are describing the Court’s decision to accept NYSPRA v. Corlett in such apocalyptic terms is telling, as is the silence from gun control organizations on their social media in the hours after th
Theres another reason they may be silent: Because they know they have this in the bag.
And once they get a ruling they want, maybe even one that goes *much further* in its implications, they'll resort to "the supreme court is the law of the land!"
Remember if you're sitting on your hands and thinking we have this in the bag, you've essentially given your consent to whatever they finally rule.
I do not consent to be governed.
(post is archived)