Thanks for the vote of confidence. I didn't read it word for word, just skimmed it. It comes off as too overtly WN and anti-woman to ever gain traction. I suggest rewriting it with the following in mind.
- Write it so that it could be adopted by US, Japan or Argentina with virtually no alteration. Talk in terms the nation (same ethnicity, religion and language - from birth) rather than whites, nonwhites, etc.
- Use the family to solve the woman issue. Only the head of a household can hold any position of influence, or vote. The head of a household is a married male with at least one biological child. Only HoH can be a judge, sheriff, politician, etc. The theory is only people who have biological children can be expected to put the future of the nation first and that the family is a unit, wife and child work with the male to make these decisions so they don't need a separate vote.
- As mentioned nationalism is the ideology. The rules enforcing nationalism should be somewhat draconian and intended to keep any converso, infiltrator or foreign agent at bay. For example taking a bribe from a foreigner should be a harsher penalty than taking a bribe from a local. While it's legal to be a jew, it's illegal to lie about it.
- The population is divided into citizens and permanent residents. Permanent residents are anyone not of the nation (niggers, jews, asians, non-english speakers, etc) they can never own land, they can never vote, they can never hold public office and they can never receive public funds in the form of grants, welfare or contracts. They can not own stock or a business. They have equal protection under the law and may work for a business that is wholly owned by citizens so long as that business is not in government, finance, military or media.
- Any legal aliens (tourists, visiting airline or ship crew, etc) have the same rights as permanent residents. Illegal aliens are considered foreign spies and subject to the death penalty.
- Specify criminal penalties for violating the bill of rights. People in law enforcement and political office are subjected to higher scrutiny and must make their finances public.
Apart from those changes the US/Canadian government is probably fine in form.
Tag me with your version 2 and I'll go through it as you asked.
Thanks for the vote of confidence. I didn't read it word for word, just skimmed it. It comes off as too overtly WN and anti-woman to ever gain traction. I suggest rewriting it with the following in mind.
1. Write it so that it could be adopted by US, Japan or Argentina with virtually no alteration. Talk in terms the nation (same ethnicity, religion and language - from birth) rather than whites, nonwhites, etc.
2. Use the family to solve the woman issue. Only the head of a household can hold any position of influence, or vote. The head of a household is a married male with at least one biological child. Only HoH can be a judge, sheriff, politician, etc. The theory is only people who have biological children can be expected to put the future of the nation first and that the family is a unit, wife and child work with the male to make these decisions so they don't need a separate vote.
3. As mentioned nationalism is the ideology. The rules enforcing nationalism should be somewhat draconian and intended to keep any converso, infiltrator or foreign agent at bay. For example taking a bribe from a foreigner should be a harsher penalty than taking a bribe from a local. While it's legal to be a jew, it's illegal to lie about it.
4. The population is divided into citizens and permanent residents. Permanent residents are anyone not of the nation (niggers, jews, asians, non-english speakers, etc) they can never own land, they can never vote, they can never hold public office and they can never receive public funds in the form of grants, welfare or contracts. They can not own stock or a business. They have equal protection under the law and may work for a business that is wholly owned by citizens so long as that business is not in government, finance, military or media.
5. Any legal aliens (tourists, visiting airline or ship crew, etc) have the same rights as permanent residents. Illegal aliens are considered foreign spies and subject to the death penalty.
6. Specify criminal penalties for violating the bill of rights. People in law enforcement and political office are subjected to higher scrutiny and must make their finances public.
Apart from those changes the US/Canadian government is probably fine in form.
Tag me with your version 2 and I'll go through it as you asked.
(post is archived)