I get cynicism is your shtick, but I don't agree at all. There's been loads of resignations, increasing amounts, in fact, and it appears as though the exact opposite is occuring. I'll give you a hint: "Decentralizing" will be a big trend moving forward, especially in the tech space. This will stretch to Government, Insurance, Finance, Healthcare and quite a few other industries in the next five or ten years. I think what you're actually seeing is traditional markets and systems are quickly becoming antiquated and measurement tools are becoming atrophied, no longer presenting realistic insights to how these trends are unfolding. So, in short, you're looking in the wrong place.
"Decentralizing" will be a big trend moving forward,
I have to disagree. "hidden centralization" will be the new methodology going forward. Ahead of decentralization, the occupation will co-opt the decentralization movement (see bitcoin and bitchute for examples). All the future "decentralizated" platforms will have some key pain-point thats centrally controllable and whenever brought up (if ever), will be portrayed in passing discussion as mere trivialities, "the one downside to an otherwise Very Good Decentralized System (tm)". For example trackers in the torrent system.
In any case, the algorithms used will promote or demote content creators and influencers, completely invisibly. And as a result the world will simply seem to drift further and further toward the socially regressive totalitarianism of the left. All apparently organically.
This is the dictatorship of the algorithm, the regime of the machine celebrity.
This is how I would do it, this is how I see it being done, therefore there is no reason why it isnt already the plan.
Could you come up with something more effective and insidious thats also plausible?
Bitcoin isn't becoming centralized. Bitchute may be a prominent alt-tech platform, but Odysee, Minds and other offshoots of the YouTube model are currently also gaining steam. I don't think these are good examples. I think expecting there won't be growing pains with milk teeth decentralizing trends would be silly anyway. I don't see these as lasting hurdles myself.
In any case, the algorithms used will promote or demote content creators and influencers, completely invisibly. And as a result the world will simply seem to drift further and further toward the socially regressive totalitarianism of the left.
This is one of the main reasons for the current YouTube exodus by content creators. I don't see what you're seeing here.
Could you come up with something more effective and insidious thats also plausible?
Maybe if I actually cared enough to put more effort in to understanding and extrapolating on meta trends across the various sectors that synthesize sensible models, but that may exist beyond the limit of my current perception or capabilities.
The simplest models we can come up with that also elide with existing playbooks, are also the most likely model the state will persue.
They will simply use front companie to first put pressure on alt-platforms. Then they will use this pressure to purchase sufficient influence of the subsector itself. At which point they will steer it toward financial models that force the larger non-acquired portion of the sector into submission .They will then follow with take over from with, infiltration, acquisition, lawfare, and compliance pressure until they bankrupt, destroy, or force the compliance of any remaining holdouts. As this process continues the use of invisible algorithmic promotion will ramp up further and further.
Except for the technological component, this is basically the model or playbook they have used for everything else in the west today.
I see no reason they should change their playbook now, when its worked so well so far.
I know I'm being horribly blackpilled at the moment, but I don't mean to be. This is just what I see. I'm happy to be dissuade in any case.
(post is archived)