Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

113

Some story and background.

So years ago, I got pretty good at predicting the direction of AI development. I knew I was a midwit. I also knew, as anyone thats not legally blind could see, that the u.s. was in a planned and intentional catastrophic decline. I thought maybe, even if I wasn't smart enough to save the u.s, maybe a sufficiently smart AI could model a strategy to save it. I read a lot of research papers. I mean 4-6 hours of reading a day. Enough that I made some highly accurate predictions in AI and neuroscience research, sometimes years in advance. The thinking was, I may not be able to stop the decline of the u.s., but maybe if I knew enough, I could suss out and hire people to take AI research in the right direction. Why? Because if I could predict what needed to be developed, before industry could, then I could hire people smart than me to actually build it. Theres a lot of people out there that aren't great at patterns and prediction but are great at engineering to spec.

While this plan worked as far as "get smart", the money wasn't there.

I decided to go in a different direction and become my own 'expert'. Lots of shitposting later, I don't know if I am an expert, but at least I'm pretty good at predicting the direction of things. Not in the generalist sense of the word "of course anyone could see a worsening of totalitarianism and an international conflict", but for example predicting the us-china-australia conflict triangle. I made more that turned out true, but I keep most of em private because I don't want to demoralize people any further than so many already are.

So here is the game as I now see it.

The vax, while somewhat dangerous (1-5% injuries) is mostly a psychological tool. The ADE line is a narrative to keep us guessing and afraid, just as the "variants" line is used on the left to likewise keep them scared and divided.

What is the tool being used for?

There is a demographic transition going on in the u.s. as we speak. And I'm not talking abou illegal aliens or the great replacement, but an altogether unmentioned secondary great replacement:

the left replacing older management and middle management.

These will, in the corporate, bureaucratic, and military world, become the long-term promotions and figureheads of these respective spheres. This is a "great filter" of sorts that will pan out massively pro-totalitarian/pro-bolshevism in the next 20 years.

The mandates will not be made anymore widespread than they already are. We will only be kept in permanent fear of that. But in practrice it will only ever be executives and management that face that mandate, and this "demographic" shift is why. What tells me this is true is the same reason that most jobs require management to be degreed: they want lefties in position of power.

Thats it, thats the game.

The "mass die-off" narrative is only just that.

They're still slow walking us into totalitarianism.

We'll be waiting for a mass die-off decades from now, because its never coming.

The intention is to "mop up" and replace what remains of the right, with the left. They are aiming for total victory and total control through idealogical purity testing.

And the jab is that.

It will naturally lead to a pseudo-collapse or semi-collapse of the west and the u.s. economically (all blamed on the "unvaxxed" of course). And as conditions deteriorate further in the u.s in the coming decades, this rhetoric will be ramped up, until we are thoroughly demonized, the same as terrorists, and rapists. That is the intention. We will be second class citizens. And it will happen. It will come to pass.

This is what the jab is about.

Making the coming transformation not merely seem normal, but natural and more importantly incontestable and inevitable.

I surmised this after reconciling my desire for accelerationism (collapsing the u.s.) with the realization that the left was in actuality persuing this exact same course. Only once they acquire their end goal, they intend to halt further collapse, and keep us in a state of perpetual totalitarian poverty not unlike east germany.

Likewise, the GOP is almost entirely on board with this plan of the DNC's, all the way down to the governors, with few exceptions.

That is the game, that is what I have forseen, and that is what they intend.

We are alone in this matter, and we must fight.

obligatory legal disclaimer that this is not a call to violence.

Now you know where we are heading.

Some story and background. So years ago, I got pretty good at predicting the direction of AI development. I knew I was a midwit. I also knew, as anyone thats not legally blind could see, that the u.s. was in a planned and intentional catastrophic decline. I thought maybe, even if I wasn't smart enough to save the u.s, maybe a sufficiently smart AI could model a strategy to save it. I read a *lot* of research papers. I mean 4-6 hours of reading a day. Enough that I made some highly accurate predictions in AI and neuroscience research, sometimes years in advance. The thinking was, I may not be able to stop the decline of the u.s., but maybe if I knew enough, I could suss out and hire people to take AI research in the right direction. Why? Because if I could predict what needed to be developed, before industry could, then I could hire people smart than me to actually build it. Theres a lot of people out there that aren't great at patterns and prediction but *are* great at engineering to spec. While this plan worked as far as "get smart", the money wasn't there. I decided to go in a different direction and become my own 'expert'. Lots of shitposting later, I don't know if I am an expert, but at least I'm pretty good at predicting the direction of things. Not in the generalist sense of the word "of course anyone could see a worsening of totalitarianism and an international conflict", but for example predicting the us-china-australia conflict triangle. I made more that turned out true, but I keep most of em private because I don't want to demoralize people any further than so many already are. So here is the game as I now see it. The vax, while somewhat dangerous (1-5% injuries) is mostly a psychological tool. The ADE line is a narrative to keep us guessing and afraid, just as the "variants" line is used on the left to likewise keep them scared and divided. What is the tool being used for? There is a demographic transition going on in the u.s. as we speak. And I'm not talking abou illegal aliens or the great replacement, but an altogether *unmentioned* secondary great replacement: the left replacing older *management* and *middle management*. These will, in the corporate, bureaucratic, and military world, become the *long-term* promotions and figureheads of these respective spheres. This is a "great filter" of sorts that will pan out massively pro-totalitarian/pro-bolshevism in the next 20 years. The mandates will not be made anymore widespread than they already are. We will *only* be kept in permanent fear of that. But in practrice it will only ever be executives and management that face that mandate, and this "demographic" shift is why. What tells me this is true is the same reason that most jobs require management to be degreed: they want lefties in position of power. Thats it, thats the game. The "mass die-off" narrative is only just that. They're still slow walking us into totalitarianism. We'll be waiting for a mass die-off decades from now, because its never coming. The intention is to "mop up" and replace what remains of the right, with the left. They are aiming for total victory and total control through idealogical purity testing. And the jab is that. It will naturally lead to a pseudo-collapse or semi-collapse of the west and the u.s. economically (all blamed on the "unvaxxed" of course). And as conditions deteriorate further in the u.s in the coming decades, this rhetoric will be ramped up, until we are thoroughly demonized, the same as terrorists, and rapists. That is the intention. We will be second class citizens. And it will happen. It will come to pass. This is what the jab is about. Making the coming transformation not merely seem *normal*, but *natural* and more importantly *incontestable* and *inevitable*. I surmised this after reconciling my desire for accelerationism (collapsing the u.s.) with the realization that the left was *in actuality* persuing this exact same course. Only once they acquire their end goal, they intend to halt further collapse, and keep us in a state of perpetual totalitarian poverty not unlike east germany. Likewise, the GOP is *almost* entirely on board with this plan of the DNC's, all the way down to the governors, with few exceptions. That is the game, that is what I have forseen, and that is what they intend. We are alone in this matter, and we must fight. *obligatory* legal disclaimer that this is not a call to violence. Now you know where we are heading.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 3 pts

I get cynicism is your shtick, but I don't agree at all. There's been loads of resignations, increasing amounts, in fact, and it appears as though the exact opposite is occuring. I'll give you a hint: "Decentralizing" will be a big trend moving forward, especially in the tech space. This will stretch to Government, Insurance, Finance, Healthcare and quite a few other industries in the next five or ten years. I think what you're actually seeing is traditional markets and systems are quickly becoming antiquated and measurement tools are becoming atrophied, no longer presenting realistic insights to how these trends are unfolding. So, in short, you're looking in the wrong place.

[–] • 1 pt

"Decentralizing" will be a big trend moving forward,

I have to disagree. "hidden centralization" will be the new methodology going forward. Ahead of decentralization, the occupation will co-opt the decentralization movement (see bitcoin and bitchute for examples). All the future "decentralizated" platforms will have some key pain-point thats centrally controllable and whenever brought up (if ever), will be portrayed in passing discussion as mere trivialities, "the one downside to an otherwise Very Good Decentralized System (tm)". For example trackers in the torrent system.

In any case, the algorithms used will promote or demote content creators and influencers, completely invisibly. And as a result the world will simply seem to drift further and further toward the socially regressive totalitarianism of the left. All apparently organically.

This is the dictatorship of the algorithm, the regime of the machine celebrity.

This is how I would do it, this is how I see it being done, therefore there is no reason why it isnt already the plan.

Could you come up with something more effective and insidious thats also plausible?

[–] • 0 pt

Bitcoin isn't becoming centralized. Bitchute may be a prominent alt-tech platform, but Odysee, Minds and other offshoots of the YouTube model are currently also gaining steam. I don't think these are good examples. I think expecting there won't be growing pains with milk teeth decentralizing trends would be silly anyway. I don't see these as lasting hurdles myself.

In any case, the algorithms used will promote or demote content creators and influencers, completely invisibly. And as a result the world will simply seem to drift further and further toward the socially regressive totalitarianism of the left.

This is one of the main reasons for the current YouTube exodus by content creators. I don't see what you're seeing here.

Could you come up with something more effective and insidious thats also plausible?

Maybe if I actually cared enough to put more effort in to understanding and extrapolating on meta trends across the various sectors that synthesize sensible models, but that may exist beyond the limit of my current perception or capabilities.

[–] • 0 pt

The simplest models we can come up with that also elide with existing playbooks, are also the most likely model the state will persue.

They will simply use front companie to first put pressure on alt-platforms. Then they will use this pressure to purchase sufficient influence of the subsector itself. At which point they will steer it toward financial models that force the larger non-acquired portion of the sector into submission .They will then follow with take over from with, infiltration, acquisition, lawfare, and compliance pressure until they bankrupt, destroy, or force the compliance of any remaining holdouts. As this process continues the use of invisible algorithmic promotion will ramp up further and further.

Except for the technological component, this is basically the model or playbook they have used for everything else in the west today.

I see no reason they should change their playbook now, when its worked so well so far.

I know I'm being horribly blackpilled at the moment, but I don't mean to be. This is just what I see. I'm happy to be dissuade in any case.