WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

786

I was talking to the woman im trying to date, and I'm kind of noticing a baiting/ego feeding pattern emerging. She claims to be conservative and likes when the guy makes the first move. To me that's fine. But I also noticed she intentionally doesn't text me, with the implication being I can text her first and she can trail the conversation from her side. This isn't a huge deal, but it comes off as irritating after a while, because it's just ego feeding through another form. And there's tons of little red flags here and there, where you wonder what exactly happened. You hear the story, and you know it makes no sense, but you can't really piece together why. So you end up having to sift through multiple conversations until you can figure out what actually happened.

A great example, she complains from time to time one of her last dates was too "physical" and she didn't like that he was so pushy. Except from what I can tell this woman is plenty physical herself. I'm actually taking things slower than she is, and she's the one pushing to be more physical. So this confuses me, because what exactly was the complaint then? Was the guy just too ugly or something, and she didn't like the idea of hooking up with him? And if so, why wait more than a few days or weeks to eventually break up with said person? Why not just pre emptively break up and be done with it?

This eventually feeds into the problem that this woman is actually a terrible communicator from what I can tell. Sure, some could say forcing a stress test on a woman is a very bad idea, due to how destructive they can be. On the other hand, I get most of my information on a woman through these tests, and they give me a much better idea of who they are as a person. Heck, I can get most info on a woman by running a simple background check online, or reverse photo searching, etc.

This makes me think she likes being subservient, but this makes no sense, since by her own words she likes being direct about topics. However it's not uncommon for women to idealize who they want to be and not who they are in reality. Either which way, it's safe to say American women as a group are very broken thanks to globohomo and the rise of all this race mixing, degenerate garbage being pushed

I was talking to the woman im trying to date, and I'm kind of noticing a baiting/ego feeding pattern emerging. She claims to be conservative and likes when the guy makes the first move. To me that's fine. But I also noticed she intentionally doesn't text me, with the implication being I can text her first and she can trail the conversation from her side. This isn't a huge deal, but it comes off as irritating after a while, because it's just ego feeding through another form. And there's tons of little red flags here and there, where you wonder what exactly happened. You hear the story, and you know it makes no sense, but you can't really piece together why. So you end up having to sift through multiple conversations until you can figure out what actually happened. A great example, she complains from time to time one of her last dates was too "physical" and she didn't like that he was so pushy. Except from what I can tell this woman is plenty physical herself. I'm actually taking things slower than she is, and she's the one pushing to be more physical. So this confuses me, because what exactly was the complaint then? Was the guy just too ugly or something, and she didn't like the idea of hooking up with him? And if so, why wait more than a few days or weeks to eventually break up with said person? Why not just pre emptively break up and be done with it? This eventually feeds into the problem that this woman is actually a terrible communicator from what I can tell. Sure, some could say forcing a stress test on a woman is a very bad idea, due to how destructive they can be. On the other hand, I get most of my information on a woman through these tests, and they give me a much better idea of who they are as a person. Heck, I can get most info on a woman by running a simple background check online, or reverse photo searching, etc. This makes me think she likes being subservient, but this makes no sense, since by her own words she likes being direct about topics. However it's not uncommon for women to idealize who they want to be and not who they are in reality. Either which way, it's safe to say American women as a group are very broken thanks to globohomo and the rise of all this race mixing, degenerate garbage being pushed

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

That's right. Back in the day there was no 'interim' period where a young female was by herself. She stayed home till she got married. That's why everything is falling apart (and arranged marriages were the norm, though it was agreed that she must like the guy and vice versa).

[–] 2 pts

Know why Romeo and Juliet both died at the end? Because they both fucking deserved it.

It wasn't a "tragedy". It was a warning. Never go against the family.

https://youtu.be/swJ9OlPhQ34?t=11

[–] 0 pt

I have thought about that often.

You're right, but I'm curious, do you know if Shakespeare meant to show it as a lesson learned?

[–] 3 pts

No. I mean, read the dialog. Everything is meant to make the star-crossed lovers the sympathetic victims in the whole story. Shakespeare was purposely writing a dramatic romantic emotional tear-jerker to get butts in the seats (so to speak) at The Globe theatre.

But I guarantee you that any fathers of teenagers in the audience all took an entirely different message from it.

"Family first. Lock them the fuck up."