WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I was talking to the woman im trying to date, and I'm kind of noticing a baiting/ego feeding pattern emerging. She claims to be conservative and likes when the guy makes the first move. To me that's fine. But I also noticed she intentionally doesn't text me, with the implication being I can text her first and she can trail the conversation from her side. This isn't a huge deal, but it comes off as irritating after a while, because it's just ego feeding through another form. And there's tons of little red flags here and there, where you wonder what exactly happened. You hear the story, and you know it makes no sense, but you can't really piece together why. So you end up having to sift through multiple conversations until you can figure out what actually happened.

A great example, she complains from time to time one of her last dates was too "physical" and she didn't like that he was so pushy. Except from what I can tell this woman is plenty physical herself. I'm actually taking things slower than she is, and she's the one pushing to be more physical. So this confuses me, because what exactly was the complaint then? Was the guy just too ugly or something, and she didn't like the idea of hooking up with him? And if so, why wait more than a few days or weeks to eventually break up with said person? Why not just pre emptively break up and be done with it?

This eventually feeds into the problem that this woman is actually a terrible communicator from what I can tell. Sure, some could say forcing a stress test on a woman is a very bad idea, due to how destructive they can be. On the other hand, I get most of my information on a woman through these tests, and they give me a much better idea of who they are as a person. Heck, I can get most info on a woman by running a simple background check online, or reverse photo searching, etc.

This makes me think she likes being subservient, but this makes no sense, since by her own words she likes being direct about topics. However it's not uncommon for women to idealize who they want to be and not who they are in reality. Either which way, it's safe to say American women as a group are very broken thanks to globohomo and the rise of all this race mixing, degenerate garbage being pushed

I was talking to the woman im trying to date, and I'm kind of noticing a baiting/ego feeding pattern emerging. She claims to be conservative and likes when the guy makes the first move. To me that's fine. But I also noticed she intentionally doesn't text me, with the implication being I can text her first and she can trail the conversation from her side. This isn't a huge deal, but it comes off as irritating after a while, because it's just ego feeding through another form. And there's tons of little red flags here and there, where you wonder what exactly happened. You hear the story, and you know it makes no sense, but you can't really piece together why. So you end up having to sift through multiple conversations until you can figure out what actually happened. A great example, she complains from time to time one of her last dates was too "physical" and she didn't like that he was so pushy. Except from what I can tell this woman is plenty physical herself. I'm actually taking things slower than she is, and she's the one pushing to be more physical. So this confuses me, because what exactly was the complaint then? Was the guy just too ugly or something, and she didn't like the idea of hooking up with him? And if so, why wait more than a few days or weeks to eventually break up with said person? Why not just pre emptively break up and be done with it? This eventually feeds into the problem that this woman is actually a terrible communicator from what I can tell. Sure, some could say forcing a stress test on a woman is a very bad idea, due to how destructive they can be. On the other hand, I get most of my information on a woman through these tests, and they give me a much better idea of who they are as a person. Heck, I can get most info on a woman by running a simple background check online, or reverse photo searching, etc. This makes me think she likes being subservient, but this makes no sense, since by her own words she likes being direct about topics. However it's not uncommon for women to idealize who they want to be and not who they are in reality. Either which way, it's safe to say American women as a group are very broken thanks to globohomo and the rise of all this race mixing, degenerate garbage being pushed

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

You are thinking about this in a completely wrong way.

You seem to think a woman is an adult human being like a man and is able to communicate to you in a manly manner, with logic and making sense. Nothing could be further from the truth. Women are just simply overgrown children with no real logical thought process.

You simply need to take charge and tell her what to do. Women are naturally subservient and want to be led. She is obviously interested in being led by you if she has given you the time of day, so take the lead. Tell her what you want her to do, and even if she says no, you tell her to do it anyways. You are the master, she is your ward. You should not ever care about her motivations for doing whatever seems insane or try to understand her. There is no point. Simply lead.

Just yesterday I told my woman to get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich, and she say's I'm going to walk through the kitchen and I'm not making a sandwich. I told her who the fuck do you think you are? And she says walking through... So I said to her, fuck you, and she said fuck you back to me. She walked through the kitchen and on into the bedroom continuing on with whatever she was doing. I went outside and got up to doing something myself and just a few minutes later she comes out with a tray with a sandwich and some potato salad and a cold beer. delivered.

Women are naturally subservient, it is their nature