WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This is a composite image, NOT a ‘real pic’. It’s paragraph 3 on the nasa website page about it.

[–] 0 pt

How is a composite image not a "real pic"? Have you ever seen a modern digital RAW image that can be separated into color channels? The imaging camera always takes a composite of red, green and blue channel images which are combined to produce color images:

A NASA camera aboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite captured a unique view of the moon as it moved in front of the sunlit side of Earth last month. The series of test images shows the fully illuminated “dark side” of the moon that is never visible from Earth. The images were captured by NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC), a four megapixel CCD camera and telescope on the DSCOVR satellite orbiting 1 million miles from Earth. From its position between the sun and Earth, DSCOVR conducts its primary mission of real-time solar wind monitoring for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth

[–] 1 pt

Literally from that same page:

>EPIC takes a series of 10 images using different narrowband spectral filters -- from ultraviolet to near infrared -- to produce a variety of science products. The red, green and blue channel images are used in these color images.

If you can’t differentiate between a photo - a static image, and a composite, then that’s on you.

[–] 0 pt

So any digital means "not a picture", got it.