![Papers PLEASE [680x542 - 57KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/T6nYc0.jpg){kind=link}
It really irks me how people use the NSDAP as a comparrison when discussing our current situation. The NS, had every right and reason to implement the measures that they did, in order to root out communism, degeneracy, and overall disorder. Had there not been the threat, the policies would not have been in place.
Exactly. Sometimes you need to use complete tyrannical government control in order to root out extremism. A country under duress has no other option in order to protect its people against Covi- er, I mean right-wing extremi- er, I mean, Islamic terro- er, I mean, communism. Yea that's the one. Then after the government has complete control over the population, and accomplishes its goals, it'll just chill out and we'll all be able to live in peace. I mean, that never happens anywhere else but THIS TIME is different. https://files.catbox.moe/rye5td.png
national socialism would have worked for that country, had the international financial cartel, not wanted war so bad. was it perfect? no, no government is, was, or will ever be. however, until we take out the trash, and clean house, NOTHING will work, because there are too many kikes seeing to it that it will fail, the people are unhappy, and they fight amongst themselves often.
If you look throughout history, Jewish subversion is more of a symptom than a cause.
It's like a weak immune system. Yes technically this person is sick because of (insert illness here) but they never would've had that problem if they were actually healthy in the first place. So are we going to sacrifice all of our freedoms, morals, principals and way of like just so fat fucks don't get Covid or should we just tell them to get their fat ass on a treadmill and keep moving?
Did you know, that there's an argument to be made, that the gun-laws implemented by Adolf hitler were more libertarian, than the current laws in even the most pro-gun US states? Rifles were pretty much unregulated in nazi germany. No registration, no background check, no age restriction, and so on.
The problem with tyrannical regimes is you can make a lot of statements that were technically true but also transitory. Things can be afforded and then taken away. The main advantage of National Socialism is that it didn't last long enough for any of that to happen. But many quite similar post-enlightenment philosophies have risen and fallen entirely on their own. We never actually question the premise, "perhaps Enlightenment thinking is flawed in some way?" We only question the correct "blend" of dysfunctional ideas that don't work and have never worked, when there are other ideologies that lasted 1,000+ years, with high levels of stability, happiness, accountability to the government, etc.
Why is that? In the period since the great enlightenment we have seen the most volatility and largest purges in human history. At what point do we say "well, these other things actually worked pretty well. Let's just go back to the wisdom of our ancestors, maybe they were onto something"
(post is archived)