much of the debunking videos have themselves been debunked
…
once you know anything of antiquity and pre-history, you quickly confirm the official explanations are as fanciful as the extreme fringe stuff pushed strictly for entertainment purposes on the show
…
endlessly suppressed artifacts and well documented yet fringe history
Links? Details? Specifics? Anything that you didn’t just pull out of your schizo ass?
They were doing the rounds back when the debunking videos first appeared.
As an example I recall, the shapes in paintings. "Debunked" as a common reference to something else. Except several paintings were of official events in which the official historical account recorded events of things flying in sky, "observing" the event.
So which is more likely, a painting recording an event which reflects the written record, or a supposedly common painting trope offered merely on a plea of authority? Which version is actually debunked? If you side strictly with evidence, the debunked is debunked.
With all of the purges, I have no idea what has survived. But needless to say, those debunking videos typically don't hold up well against actual history.
That said, you can believe Jews and secret societies well confirmed for historical revisionism (aka, your "schizo ass"), or you can believe the historical record and genetic science where applicable.
Again, I choose to ignore your ass, jews, and secret societies well known for historical revisionism, suppressed history and artifacts.
So which is more likely, a painting recording an event which reflects the written record, or a supposedly common painting trope offered merely on a plea of authority? Which version is actually debunked? If you sude strictly with evidence, the debunked is debunked.
Well considering that the sun and moon aka the “shapes” were not depicted in that way until many hundreds of years after the fact and during relatively narrow range of time in which religious art was heavily focused on incorporating such motifs, and the fact that the actual design of the shapes are drastically different painting-to-painting, despite their relative positions being very consistent as you would expect from an artistic motif, I’d say it makes far more sense that the shapes are exactly what art historians say they are and not aliens. Unless of course you think the aliens came down hundreds of years later to inform the christian world of how they should be depicting the scene but were were really bad at describing the appearance of the sky objects.
You'll find much bullshit surrounds the topic you advocate. Such depictions were in fact commonly found. The depiction you describe only comes to us from pleas to authority. Self appointed "authorities." Nothing to see here, according to you. Lol. Thus your schizo ass reference actually does become relevant.
Bringing us full circle. You prefer baseless, self appointed subject matter experts who ignore documented history because it defies common explanation and no other reason. I prefer the facts. It really is this simple. But I also understand indoctrination combined with ignorance is hard to ignore. You understand there is much history which coincides...
Simple FACT is, endless paintings do in fact document observations of the people which directly contradict the so called experts, according to written records. That's a fact. Who do you believe? The people who were actually there, or people with an agenda who are equally and endlessly confirmed as simply making shit up to fit a narrative? You advocate the later. Whereby those in mainstream who reject the narrative literally destroy their career, regardless of supporting scientific evidence. That's not science, though you're welcome to continue to pretend it is. Me, I continue to side with facts, evidence, and the scientific process.
As I said, you chose to believe Jews, secret societies, and confirmed liars. I chose to follow the evidence as required by the scientific process.
Will also point out, you made assertions about my personal position which is also false. Alien doesn't have to mean extraterrestrial. It's already well established advanced civilizations at least on par with our current technology existed at least 13,000 years ago (pre-flood). Dictionary definition confirms that as "alien", but doesn't necessarily mean extraterrestrial.
The problem with people like you is you don't begin to realize just how profoundly ignorant you are of what's actually documented and supported by archeological evidence. Museums commonly have entire wearhouse filled with "out of place artifacts." These are common. Which means artifacts which destroy mainstream positions but are explicitly ignored because they destroy mainstream positions. These are the liars and self appointed experts you support.
(post is archived)