The show is just that ENTERTAINMENT. However I read Chariots of the Gods by Erich von Däniken when I was a kid.
10/10 all religious encounters with beings recorded all through history the world over can be explained by Aliens. Which then links Religion and science. A race of Aliens makes more sense than a Sky Daddy.
it is all a matter of definition... regardless of what you call it, the real point is this
is it gong to be real that there is an afterlife ? and if so, are we going to be allowed different possibilities depending on what we do here on earth ?
no, there cannot be a "scientific" answer, that is part of the play
Never mind, much of the debunking videos have themselves been debunked.
Your point is valid. The history channel explicitly told them to offer the most fanciful notions. Which they did. But at its core, once you know anything of antiquity and pre-history, you quickly confirm the official explanations are as fanciful as the extreme fringe stuff pushed strictly for entertainment purposes on the show.
The truth is actually between the two, but rather far away from anything offered by mainstream, protected by mighty pleas to authority and endlessly suppressed artifacts and well documented yet fringe history.
So people have a choice. Believe confirmed liars and gate keepers, usually with ties to secret societies and Jewish interests, or actual recorded history, genetics and the archeological record. I chose the latter.
much of the debunking videos have themselves been debunked
…
once you know anything of antiquity and pre-history, you quickly confirm the official explanations are as fanciful as the extreme fringe stuff pushed strictly for entertainment purposes on the show
…
endlessly suppressed artifacts and well documented yet fringe history
Links? Details? Specifics? Anything that you didn’t just pull out of your schizo ass?
They were doing the rounds back when the debunking videos first appeared.
As an example I recall, the shapes in paintings. "Debunked" as a common reference to something else. Except several paintings were of official events in which the official historical account recorded events of things flying in sky, "observing" the event.
So which is more likely, a painting recording an event which reflects the written record, or a supposedly common painting trope offered merely on a plea of authority? Which version is actually debunked? If you side strictly with evidence, the debunked is debunked.
With all of the purges, I have no idea what has survived. But needless to say, those debunking videos typically don't hold up well against actual history.
That said, you can believe Jews and secret societies well confirmed for historical revisionism (aka, your "schizo ass"), or you can believe the historical record and genetic science where applicable.
Again, I choose to ignore your ass, jews, and secret societies well known for historical revisionism, suppressed history and artifacts.
(post is archived)