So you have scientific facilities, very complex structures that are anything but the result of mere randomness, required for people trying to copy and replicate mechanisms that are found in what we call nature
And this is supposed to prove that the so called "clever soup" is just the result of randomness?
...
I think those scientists are studying somebody else's project here
Which evidence better fits the model?
God creates a universe, eventually choses the best looking rock globe and then sits there for a billion years trying out different flavours of soup, fish, dinosaurs and squirrels before finally settling on making a man (and for some reason making niggers amazingly similar to monkeys)
Or soup evolved and we have a long trail of weird stuff that it all involved into until we ended up with clever monkeys which then forked into men and niggers.
men look at these processes and can replicate most of them, a bit like I can do any of the jobs required to build a house, but I haven't actually built a whole one yet.
If any one person was clever enough to understand all these processes simultaneously, then we wouldn't need quite so many people studying it all
The fact that you can copy all or part of a building, doesn't mean that this building is the result of randomness
Also, it's not for random reasons if that building, that structure, doesn't collapse. Just as it's not for random reasons that the "how to", the knowledge to build it, has been preserved and transmitted
Guy1: Life is the product of genetic engineering
Guy2: magic soup came out of nowhere
...
humans were randomly putting up structures for centuries, just because we have elevators, air con and underfloor heating now, doesn't make any of it sky pixie magic
if evolution wasn't a thing, life would have stopped evolving around 2000BC, but it doesn't, therefore these processes are eternal and inevitable
(post is archived)