Elevators, air con, and underfloor heating, those structures aren't the result of randomness
Now regarding evolution... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulmonoscorpius
>Pulmonoscorpius kirktonensis (from Latin pulmonis scorpius, 'lung scorpion') is an extinct species of scorpion[1] that lived during the Viséan and Serpukhovian ages of the Carboniferous period, around 336.0 – 326.4 million years ago.[2]
Are you ready for a breathtaking picture of that extinct animal? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/67/20210116_Pulmonoscorpius_kirktonensis.png
Yeah
That's a scorpion
structures aren't the result of randomness
i didn't say there were, the point is that everything evolves
That's a scorpion
"a large, fragmentary specimen is estimated to have been 700 mm (28 inches) long when alive" so, just like a modern one then...
Anomalocaris, it's just a shrimp...
species: a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding
one of that species died, why is this relevant?
The fact that "everything evolves" (quotes because well, some didn't evolve much, obviously...) doesn't prove that life is simply the end result of sheer randomness
I don't think the scorpion will evolve into something entirely different than what it is and has pretty much always been, maybe it will shrink in size eventually, big deal
I don't think the scorpion will evolve into something entirely different than what it is and has pretty much always been
But that's exactly how evolution works: keep changing until optimum output is achieved. If the input variables change (which they won't, because it lives in a desert and eats bugs), then mutations will produce a change.
The fact that "everything evolves" doesn't prove that life is simply the end result of sheer randomness
well we have a whole trail of "mutations" going from soup to monkey, so yes, we do kinda have proof that soup produces life because we can point to all the incremental changes in the fossil record
it's this process: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
like take an RNA virus, the mutation rates are much higher as there is not the same correction mechanisms, randomness is built in. viruses are relatively simple and we can currently create new ones by inserting new stands in their RNA and growing it inside a cell. some viruses don't actually reproduce by themselves, they infect another virus and that does the reproduction for them. So it's hard to define 'life' as something that reproduces, so you could argue that some viruses aren't really living things
(post is archived)