![Libtards are really bad at logic. [750x1072 - 120KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/x6Szhv.jpg){kind=link}
Where's the proof of a "large population"?
Where's the proof of a "large population"?
The huge Labour required to make the moai.
So every researcher puts the population at least at 10 people per square kilometer which is really high for a stone age people.
Feed by fertile soil.
They chopped down every tree including food trees like nut trees.
Explain how you think this wouldn't hurt ecology?
The huge Labour required to make the moai.
So every researcher puts the population at least at 10 people per square kilometer which is really high for a stone age people.
Feed by fertile soil.
They chopped down every tree including food trees like nut trees.
Explain how you think this wouldn't hurt ecology?
So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there?
So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there?
The way they built the moai and recall they migrated by boat to Chile and new zealand
The way they built the moai and recall they migrated by boat to Chile and new zealand
So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there? Trees don't grow on volcanic rock
"16 million palm trees, covering almost 70% of the surface, were estimated to grow once on Rapa Nui."
>So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there?
>Trees don't grow on volcanic rock
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/history-of-geology/climate-overpopulation-environment-the-rapa-nui-debate/
"16 million palm trees, covering almost 70% of the surface, were estimated to grow once on Rapa Nui."
(post is archived)