![Libtards are really bad at logic. [750x1072 - 120KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/x6Szhv.jpg){kind=link}
If it were volcanic rock rapanui and would of had been able to grow their sweet potato crops and end up with a massive population.
1 line in and you began with a false premise.
Try again with a premise that acknowledges the large population
If it were volcanic rock rapanui and would of had been able to grow their sweet potato crops and end up with a massive population.
1 line in and you began with a false premise.
Try again with a premise that acknowledges the large population
Where's the proof of a "large population"?
Where's the proof of a "large population"?
The huge Labour required to make the moai.
So every researcher puts the population at least at 10 people per square kilometer which is really high for a stone age people.
Feed by fertile soil.
They chopped down every tree including food trees like nut trees.
Explain how you think this wouldn't hurt ecology?
The huge Labour required to make the moai.
So every researcher puts the population at least at 10 people per square kilometer which is really high for a stone age people.
Feed by fertile soil.
They chopped down every tree including food trees like nut trees.
Explain how you think this wouldn't hurt ecology?
So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there?
So where's the evidence that trees EVER grew there?
(post is archived)