WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome.

Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii.

Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome. Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii. Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

So your position is in fact that the guy in the video is wrong? You can read the other comments confirming his comments aligned after I stopped watching.

I am very familiar with the man in the video and his work. I respect him very much for being an excellent hobby scientist. He used to be a doctor and changed over to doing science and engineering work instead. He's rigorous about his work. He's not completely wrong in what he says, but he did make a lot of assumptions that are incorrect. His plan of using a fiber laser and optical systems to focus the beam are not plausible. He, like most people, don't have the practical experience with laser lens and mirror systems to realize that lasers do not work the same way as other light sources do in those optical setups. His demonstration with solar light collection to burn materials is also flawed for comparison to laser radiation because the spectrum of sunlight is much wider than the radiation from a laser and cannot be directly compared.

He also did not take the power source explanation far enough so it cannot be assumed to work for the application. You cannot power a multi-kilowatt fiber laser directly from LiPO batteries (he said Li-Ion but showed a LiPO battery pack). He also neglected to take into account the conditions of low Earth orbit and its effects on the laser system. Fiber lasers are very, very finicky and I don't think you can simply throw a fiber laser into space and expect it to work at its full capacity or even at all. He probably skipped these things because he was just trying to give laypeople a simplified version of things in order to say there is some credence to the space laser claims but not actually take a deep scientific dive into the subject matter. I have other issues with his information, but it wasn't a deep dive so I'd have to contact him directly to see where he was going with those issues.

Now then, why are you subversive, dishonest, and manipulative? Why are you baselessly attacking me with ChatGPT bullshit? Is it because you're butthurt over past exposures

You have not provided any proof I used ChatGPT. Why are you attacking me with unproven lies and dishonestly claiming I am using ChatGPT to write what I am writing? Why did you start your bullshit up again today after we had stopped last night if you yourself are not butthurt that you got corrected on your analysis of his video? You even pinged me in the comment you resumed your attack on, which is a very clear sign that someone is butthurt because you wanted to make sure I saw your butthurt comment. That's really sad. Do you not have anything better to do? Do you not have friends you can hang out with? Maybe you should go have a conversation with ChatGPT if you are lonely.

[–] 0 pt

Another guy here claims this is his domain. So which is it?

Why are you attacking me with unproven lies and dishonestly claiming I am using ChatGPT

pilpulling bullshit. You continue to dodge the fact that your commentary has absolutely nothing to do with what I stated and you just jabber-jargon to attack me out of nowhere for absolutely no reason and did so when my commentary is in fact 100% accurate (aside from the obvious speculation whereby it's obviously clear I stopped watching and I stated why). Stop with your bullshit.

What you've now stated is that I'm right and was correct to state it, while you also claim we're both wrong and right and then continue to goalpost move while dodging the basic questions, at top, while pretending my questions (first asked and you ignored and then tried to twist/turn) shouldn't be answered. Your tactics are textbook Jew bullshit from top to bottom. This is where here I've pushed back and in the past questions/exposed your agenda. Stop the bullshit if you don't want people to think you're a subversive Jew. You continue to use subversive, dishonest, and manipulative Jew-style tactics. What is anyone supposed to believe about you? Stop the bullshit if you don't want people to think you're a subversive Jew.

[–] 0 pt

Another guy here claims this is his domain. So which is it?

Who is claiming this? I'd like to talk shop with them in that case.

pilpulling bullshit. You continue to dodge the fact that your commentary has absolutely nothing to do with what I stated and you just jabber-jargon to attack me out of nowhere for absolutely no reason and did so when my commentary is in fact 100% accurate (aside from the obvious speculation whereby it's obviously clear I stopped watching and I stated why). Stop with your bullshit.

I am spending the time to read your commentary and reply to it in kind. I don't think you are reading my commentary because you are not refuting my words. You simply attack me without making reference to where you disagree. That shows that you are not here to debate or discuss. You are simply here to attack. Stop acting so butthurt and have a real discussion. We both could learn something from it.

What you've now stated is that I'm right and was correct to state it, while you also claim we're both wrong and right and then continue to goalpost move while dodging the basic questions, at top, while pretending my questions (first asked and you ignored and then tried to twist/turn) shouldn't be answered. Your tactics are textbook Jew bullshit from top to bottom. This is where here I've pushed back and in the past questions/exposed your agenda. Stop the bullshit if you don't want people to think you're a subversive Jew. You continue to use subversive, dishonest, and manipulative Jew-style tactics. What is anyone supposed to believe about you? Stop the bullshit if you don't want people to think you're a subversive Jew.

Well since you called me a jew (with a capital J at that), then I will call you a jew because you are absolutely acting like one. You are not debating the content of my words but instead are simply trying to shout me down. That is a typical jewish attack and it resonates clearly. I'm pretty sure most people on Poal don't think I am a jew so you are in the minority here. You just talk bullshit on all topics because you are here to subvert not create or spread knowledge. You just want to silence people who go against your jewish narrative and agenda. You keep proving that by the way you keep on going through your usual routine. It's old and tired and obvious.

I'm not going to feed you any longer. Go ahead with you signature jewish finishing move and proclaim yourself the victor because I decided not to waste my time on your attacks. I'm sure your next comment will be full on gloating and congratulating yourself for defeating me, exposing me as a jew and for a job well done on proving me wrong. Go ahead and do that. I know it means a lot to you to feel like you won. I just don't give a shit about you other than to reserve some rope in your name. Goodbye, jew.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Who is claiming this? I'd like to talk shop with them in that case.

You should read the comments before you attempted to baselessly sandblast me. More information was provided which explains my line of thinking and position. Which further highlights the unfounded commentary you provided, in turn raising the question as to why you're doing so? Again, why the obvious ax and agenda?

I have read your commentary. The fact you claim I haven't implies either you misunderstood, didn't read mine, or are dishonestly pursuing an agenda.

There it is. Your projection implying I'm a Jew when you have been exposed using textbook Jew tactics. You basically just admitted you're a Jew shill. Read from the top. Read the other comments. My comments align with the video. Your attack of me from the very beginning, claiming I don't know what I'm saying while at the same time you backhandedly admitted not only do I know what I'm saying but it is in alignment with the guy in the video. You then claim he's wrong and confirm you've not bothered to read the other comments, whereby someone else here asserted this is his field. All of which confirms you're talking out of your ass at every turn. Accordingly, it's not unreasonable to push back against someone who:

  1. baelessly attacked me using non-contextual jabber-jargon which strongly implies you got it from ChatGPT
  2. Say he's wrong and right
  3. Say I'm wrong and right; therefor "supporting" I'm a Jew (I'm the attacked person here and sought nothing from you)
  4. claim it isn't his field while also acknowledging you didn't read the comments
  5. claim I didn't read the comments while you admitted you didn't
  6. continuously pilpill obvious bullshit while claiming victim status in an exchange/attack YOU initiated. Again, classic Jew attack/victim cries

So please, you're not fooling anyone.

If you don't want people to believe you're a subversive Jew, stop baselessly attacking people based upon purely subversive textbook jew tactics - including projection in your latest exchanges. It's sad. It's pathetic. It's transparent.