Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome.

Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii.

Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome. Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii. Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Notice how you dodge every fact offered. I did. Move that goalpost.

You are extremely dishonest, subversive, and manipulative. And you came out of nowhere to do so. What ax do you have to grind against me that you've made up this entire fiction and exposed yourself? Butthurt over past exchanges? Guess you really don't like me now because you keep getting called out and exposed. I'll let others try to determine your agenda.

[–] • -1 pt

Notice how you dodge every fact offered. I did. Move that goalpost.

Notice how dodges every request for proof of his claims that I am not genuine in my information. He always tries to (((turn it around))) on me instead of bringing proof.

It's amazing how you try so hard to silence people who don't agree with your made up bullshit. I don't come out of nowhere on the subject of lasers. My posting history shows I am consistent in commenting on this topic because I am knowledgeable in this subject matter. You, on the other hand, have never once demonstrated any of what you supply to be real and instead just use words that you obviously don't understand. You are either highly affected by the Dunning-Kruger Effect or you just like to spread disinfo on random topics because you desperately seek attention and validation. Or you're just here to subvert facts and truth.

Why do you act so whiny and clueless instead of engaging in actual discussion if you know so much about this subject? Why not actually discuss things with me and prove I'm "cheating" or making shit up? Let's do this properly so you can have your chance to "expose" me.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

So your position is in fact that the guy in the video is wrong? You can read the other comments confirming his comments aligned after I stopped watching. Thusly, confirming you're a deceptive idiot.

Now then, why are you subversive, dishonest, and manipulative? Why are you baselessly attacking me with ChatGPT bullshit? Is it because you're butthurt over past exposures?

[–] • 0 pt

So your position is in fact that the guy in the video is wrong? You can read the other comments confirming his comments aligned after I stopped watching.

I am very familiar with the man in the video and his work. I respect him very much for being an excellent hobby scientist. He used to be a doctor and changed over to doing science and engineering work instead. He's rigorous about his work. He's not completely wrong in what he says, but he did make a lot of assumptions that are incorrect. His plan of using a fiber laser and optical systems to focus the beam are not plausible. He, like most people, don't have the practical experience with laser lens and mirror systems to realize that lasers do not work the same way as other light sources do in those optical setups. His demonstration with solar light collection to burn materials is also flawed for comparison to laser radiation because the spectrum of sunlight is much wider than the radiation from a laser and cannot be directly compared.

He also did not take the power source explanation far enough so it cannot be assumed to work for the application. You cannot power a multi-kilowatt fiber laser directly from LiPO batteries (he said Li-Ion but showed a LiPO battery pack). He also neglected to take into account the conditions of low Earth orbit and its effects on the laser system. Fiber lasers are very, very finicky and I don't think you can simply throw a fiber laser into space and expect it to work at its full capacity or even at all. He probably skipped these things because he was just trying to give laypeople a simplified version of things in order to say there is some credence to the space laser claims but not actually take a deep scientific dive into the subject matter. I have other issues with his information, but it wasn't a deep dive so I'd have to contact him directly to see where he was going with those issues.

Now then, why are you subversive, dishonest, and manipulative? Why are you baselessly attacking me with ChatGPT bullshit? Is it because you're butthurt over past exposures

You have not provided any proof I used ChatGPT. Why are you attacking me with unproven lies and dishonestly claiming I am using ChatGPT to write what I am writing? Why did you start your bullshit up again today after we had stopped last night if you yourself are not butthurt that you got corrected on your analysis of his video? You even pinged me in the comment you resumed your attack on, which is a very clear sign that someone is butthurt because you wanted to make sure I saw your butthurt comment. That's really sad. Do you not have anything better to do? Do you not have friends you can hang out with? Maybe you should go have a conversation with ChatGPT if you are lonely.