I know, before pakis and arabs started to shit all over the place, east asians were called asian and there was no ambiguity, nobody ever thought of a shitskin when talking about asian
Asian is (meant) japanese, korean, vietnamese, cambodian, chinese, thai https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Map_of_Asia_(it).svg/2738px-Map_of_Asia_(it).svg.png
.svg/2738px-Map_of_Asia_(it).svg.png){kind=link}
But geopolitically speaking those are east asians for the most part (south east asians aside) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/East_Asia_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg/1200px-East_Asia_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg.png
So yeah, east asian there's no ambiguity
Russians aren't called asian, even though russia is in asia.
BTW, a continent is a large landmass (at least mostly) surrounded by sea, or a landmass on a tectonic plate, if you want to enter the realm of geology. In any case, asia is not a continent, just as europe is not a continent. The continent is called eurasia.
So why even make distinctions. Eurasian female raped by eurasian male. Could be neighbors, or they could be originating from literally opposite sides of the planet, with their latest common ancestor literally being an ape. Who the fuck cares. Both are eurasians.
My triggering continues.
This is asia, this is the standard, it's not my standard, it's the standard, it's geography
And yes a part of russia is in asia, and no all russians aren't white
The standard regarding the landmass doesn't matter. Pakis are sandniggers, just as arabs are. You can differentiate between those, but they're in the same category. Just as what we call "asians" belong to the same category, but can be differentiated.
I tend towards openly expressing so-called "racist" views. Whenever I do this, I'm told, that I can't judge individual the members of some group by my statistics. Which I'm not doing. Show me a smart nigger, and I'll treat him like a smart person. But I won't cease calling him a nigger, should there be a reason for doing this. And I also won't call him some faggotry like "colored", or even the more faggy "coloured". Whites have more different colors in their phenotype than all the other races combined, which always are shades of brown.
In any case, calling sandniggers "asians" is insulting towards asians, it leads to factually wrong prejudices in favor of sandniggers while to the detriment of asians, and it's even MORE unjustly collectivizing than my open racism is.
As a racist I still give individuals a chance, to prove themselves, and I only try to have realistic expectations, which are more just and have a lower margin of error than what those fucking enlightened humanists do. Their humanism leads to something far worse and insincere than me calling a nigger a nigger, and those fuckers are even proud of it, and think, that their blatant dystopianism is of moral value.
Okay, and now I'm triggered enough to gas them all. Fuck.
(post is archived)