WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Pretty sure combs are a white person thing to start with.

[–] 2 pts

Or east asian. Kinda pointless without straight hair.

[–] 3 pts

I lived and worked in a 3rd world country for a couple of years. Used to see locals walking along the road to 'town' carrying their shoes. Then putting them on when they got close to the town center, even if they were just the cheapest rubber flip flops.. Then taking them off when they left town and walking back home barefoot, again.

[–] 3 pts

Interesting. Were they too expensive to risk wearing out?

[–] 2 pts

That, and a 'show of wealth'. Similar to gold chains and rims here in the 1st world.

I'm thinking they're more comfortable barefoot.

[–] 2 pts

Having White hair is a hate crime against black people.

  • future rhetoric
[–] 2 pts

"Black folks"

I think OP means niggers?

.

be aware of the Left trying to appropriate the word "folks" https://www.etymonline.com/word/folk

Old English folc : German Volk - "people"

"Folk" is a term for Whites only, the Left want to subvert this, that's why they are suddenly all using it, post Trump

[–] 2 pts

blacks who wear modern clothes, or read and write, or use modern tech are guilty of cultural appropriation.

Fortunately, most of them can’t read or write.

[–] 2 pts

Wool. They don’t have hair, they have wool. If they leave it grow into an afro it adopts the same “style” as that of a sheep that needs shearing.

[–] 1 pt

It's biological appropriation.

[–] 0 pt

Blacks wouldn’t have combs if it wasn’t for whites, it’s a pretty complex invention for them. So yes.