Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism.

People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization.

TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism. People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization. TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 0 pt

Do you mean minimum?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Maximum in this case (and minimum because you don't want inbreeding problems). Both inbreeding or outbreeding depression is bad (usually the focus is on inbreeding depression). See the other comments.

[–] • 1 pt

Maximum genetic distance between you and your mate would mean getting a girl from some isolated native tribe (More literally it would require bestiality).

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

oh... yea, I should have written "Enforce a limit to genetic distance" or just "Limit genetic distance". I screwed up.