Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism.

People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization.

TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism. People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization. TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

The pressure from (((the media))) and (((education))) to go to college out-of-state is absolutely put there to break up local community cohesion and weaken local cultures. Those kids fall in love with someone on the other side of the country, and boom. Whatever towns they came from just got brain drain. Next that couple is put under pressure to find a "career", which means moving to a city.

[–] • 2 pts

When people start talking about how they are 1/8 German, 1/8 Irish, 1/8 French, 1/8 Scottish, 1/8 Swedish meatball etc etc you get the picture. They have no one ethnicity they identify with. They've become a mutt. If they'd followed paternal lineage they'd have one to identify with and that's it.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yes. Those people who have mixed lineages like that, wtf are they doing? And yea, culture and land too. People who constantly move about/around will have less connection to the land local customs, lore. If some beautiful building is destroyed by niggers and jews replace it with something grotesque, for a 10th generation native that'd be close to desecrating holy land.

Sand niggers may be low IQ inbreds but they are very enthnocentric.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

This line of thinking may not be bullet proof but interesting nonetheless:

The Romans they were strong and expanded by conquering ever more territory. Soon they had an empire. They made infrastructure so that they could move faster, more easily, between different parts of the empire. So what happens next? Oh, suddenly mr Roman fucks a Spanish lady, oh, and a French one too. Oh genetic distance increases, ethnocentrism decreases. Oh, the empire suddenly for no reason at all gets weaker. Barbarians with strong/close genetic bonds easily invades and destroys the empire. Experts shocked.

I guess the TLDR version of this is:

pure blood men creates traveling traveling creates mixed blood men mixed blood men are conquered by pure blood men

[–] • 0 pt

Do you mean minimum?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Maximum in this case (and minimum because you don't want inbreeding problems). Both inbreeding or outbreeding depression is bad (usually the focus is on inbreeding depression). See the other comments.

[–] • 1 pt

Maximum genetic distance between you and your mate would mean getting a girl from some isolated native tribe (More literally it would require bestiality).

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

oh... yea, I should have written "Enforce a limit to genetic distance" or just "Limit genetic distance". I screwed up.