Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism.

People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization.

TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

The more distant people are to each other the less ethnocentric. That's probably one of the big reasons behind Whites being less ethnocentric than the lower races. Whites invented airplanes, cars and trains, we could start marrying from other cities, even countries. This might have lowered ethnocentrism. People with low ethnocentrism are easy to beat, they are not a group, they are isolated individuals with weak genetic bonds. That's why (((they))) encourage mongrelization. TLDR: Fuck someone in your home town

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

This line of thinking may not be bullet proof but interesting nonetheless:

The Romans they were strong and expanded by conquering ever more territory. Soon they had an empire. They made infrastructure so that they could move faster, more easily, between different parts of the empire. So what happens next? Oh, suddenly mr Roman fucks a Spanish lady, oh, and a French one too. Oh genetic distance increases, ethnocentrism decreases. Oh, the empire suddenly for no reason at all gets weaker. Barbarians with strong/close genetic bonds easily invades and destroys the empire. Experts shocked.

I guess the TLDR version of this is:

pure blood men creates traveling traveling creates mixed blood men mixed blood men are conquered by pure blood men