Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

There's ~70,000 alcohol related deaths per year.
There's ~50,000 gun related deaths per year. Many of these cases are also in the alcohol related numbers.

Alcohol is also related to a majority of so-called date rape, child abuse, and domestic violence cases. Guns can be responsible for preventing most rapes and domestic violence cases. They can also be used to solve for child abuse cases.

The companies that manufacture the alcohol make billions per year, poisoning people, killing them slowly over time, causing people to be violent, causing crashes. These are well documented effects of alcohol consumption.

If we apply all the same logic to alcohol that the anti-gun assholes apply to guns, do you think the argument would hold? Aside from them just agreeing to ban both, which would be rare to find someone who would take the ban alcohol position, I see no argument that could be used.

For the record I don't believe in banning most things and just prefer people to suffer swift and certain consequence. Logically though, alcohol should go first.

There's ~70,000 alcohol related deaths per year. There's ~50,000 gun related deaths per year. Many of these cases are also in the alcohol related numbers. Alcohol is also related to a majority of so-called date rape, child abuse, and domestic violence cases. Guns can be responsible for preventing most rapes and domestic violence cases. They can also be used to solve for child abuse cases. The companies that manufacture the alcohol make billions per year, poisoning people, killing them slowly over time, causing people to be violent, causing crashes. These are well documented effects of alcohol consumption. If we apply all the same logic to alcohol that the anti-gun assholes apply to guns, do you think the argument would hold? Aside from them just agreeing to ban both, which would be rare to find someone who would take the ban alcohol position, I see no argument that could be used. For the record I don't believe in banning most things and just prefer people to suffer swift and certain consequence. Logically though, alcohol should go first.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

https://poal.co/s/banbooze

That's my subforum. I still don't think guns should be illegal lol.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

If we apply all the same logic to alcohol that the anti-gun assholes apply to guns, do you think the argument would hold?

No. Because alcohol isn't a threat to the enemy. Guns are. In fact, notice how drugs are being legalized. The problem is we tend to look at these kinds of things from a society point of view. However, we have a much deeper problem that we are being attacked by people in a Trojan horse. Most people don't even understand we're in a and you and I are the enemy being attacked.