I didn't know he was gay.
It's one of those "hurr my sexuality is not bound by your binary paradigm!!!!" type deals. He's protected, so there's not MUCH. But the "cannibal" and "necro" parts exist.
And I get this is going to put me into question, (but for full transparency) which I'm okay with. But I don't save things about these types of extremes due to what the connected topics often are. So they gay thing, whatever if I'm wrong that's not really that important as the other 2.
So they gay thing, whatever if I'm wrong that's not really that important as the other 2.
Which is why I left out the other items in my (joking) reply.
Which is fine. I just want to be clear and transparent. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong. I could definitely be mistaking some other degenerate I've read about. I don't want to look as though I'm pushing a lie which when called out then absolves the 2 definitive truths.
I dunno. He's a cannibal. That's fucked up enough for me.
(post is archived)