WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

How much land do you think it takes to house, feed, clothe, and otherwise provide for the needs of one civilized human being?

Well, the ENTIRE land surface of the world (including the antarctic, the mountains, deserts, jungle, etc) is 36.8 billion acres. The human population of the world is 7.84 billion people.

That is just 4.7 acres per person.

How much land do you think it takes to house, feed, clothe, and otherwise provide for the needs of one civilized human being? Well, the ENTIRE land surface of the world (including the antarctic, the mountains, deserts, jungle, etc) is 36.8 billion acres. The human population of the world is 7.84 billion people. That is just 4.7 acres per person.

(post is archived)

The big blank areas are (mostly) 'difficult' to habitate. Northern Canada beyond the treeline is all tundra (same with North Slope in Alaska), Africa has the Sahara in the north and Namibia/dry-as-fuck-lands in the southeast. Western China is all desert, Mongolia is all steppe or desert, Australia is mostly desert/arid, South America's got the Amazon where fish and bugs try to crawl up your wee or you can die in the deserts to the south. Greenland isn't green, Iceland barely has trees (and didnt have any at one point)--- also traditionally hard to get to. Russia has even more frozen tundra. The southern coast of the Arabian peninsula is all hot shitty desert. Western US is arid, New Zealand just fucked up, and Antarctica is as cold as my ex's heart.

[–] 0 pt

Namibia is northwestern africa, not southeastern

It's southwestern***, Namibia touches South Africa. I don't know why I wrote southeast.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah i stand corrected. Always thought it was up above the ivory coast.

Southwestern.

[–] 0 pt

Huh, fuck me, youre right. I thought it was up by the ivory coast.

Right. So only about 2/3 of the land is really habitable. That takes us down to 3 acres per person, without allowing for natural wilderness at all.