Constitutionally they are required to enforce it. Failure to enforce is illegal. In this case, they are aiding an invader. Likewise, it protection transfers back to the states for enforcement.
SCOTUS may criminally rule to maintain the status quo under the guise of immigration. Which would officially declare themselves traitors. But states have the right to maintain their border. Up to and including militia to shoot on sight. Additionally,, anyone aiding an invasion is a traitor per the Constitution and federal law. Invaders and anyone aiding or sheltering may be shot on sight.
Constitutionally they are required to enforce it. Failure to enforce is illegal. In this case, they are aiding an invader. Likewise, it protection transfers back to the states for enforcement.
SCOTUS may criminally rule to maintain the status quo under the guise of immigration. Which would officially declare themselves traitors. But states have the right to maintain their border. Up to and including militia to shoot on sight. Additionally,, anyone aiding an invasion is a traitor per the Constitution and federal law. Invaders and anyone aiding or sheltering may be shot on sight.
(post is archived)