WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

530

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Your suggestion might've worked ten years ago to varying effect, but that would be an immediate fail today unless you were a guy scoring ten in all the rankings.

So you would be suckered for the food whore then you're saying?

[–] 1 pt

> No. Anyone that talks on a cell during a date, or is surfing the net, is a fail. You're either there at the date, or not. You should not pay for a meal for someone whom you just met through a dating site. The date is an interview and you shouldn't expect the interviewer for a job to pay for the interviewees meal.

>

> So you would be suckered for the food whore then, you're saying?

/FTFY

Oddly enough, I've never used dating sites or apps to score a date. I find technologies influence upon human behavior to be an interesting thing to scrutinize and observe. Like you, I agree that there are more females who date only to get a free meal, but I'm pessimistic enough to say that it's likely four quarters at the least. That one-third are confident enough in their actions that they've no fear in admitting that they exploit thirsty men for a meal is very telling as that's an indicator of a sociopath as it also highlights a growing psychosis among men in regards to dating. That's a dangerous situation for those who don't see it. I'd rather play with a truck full of nitro on a bumpy road.

No, but anyone that talks on a cell during a date or is surfing the net is a fail. You either are there at the date or not. You should not expect me that just met you in real life if a dating site to pay for a meal. The date is like and interview and you don't expect the interviewer for a job to pay for a meal, you're also an interviewer so I expect the same.